Right, cause Mo Cheeks is the only other option. Look, If you enjoy 45-50 regular season wins and first round playoff flame outs, Nate is your man. I mean he is your fucking man. It's all you're ever going to get. Enjoy!
The proof used in the post I was responding to was that we were much better against Golden State before Nate. I believe Mo Cheeks was the coach then, so I'm just saying that if we're using our record against Golden State as our measure of sucess, then Mo Cheeks would be a better coach. I'm sorry that my defending of Nate gets under your skin, but I think you're displeasure towards him is stronger than any praise I have for him. I ask simple questions that typically center around, what available coaches could we get that would be an upgrade and what schemes would someone use when they don't agree with what he's doing. I rarely get responses that address those questions.
Coaches who weren't properly using the talents of the players who got injured. Because their system is molded to players they wish they have, not the players they have.
