http://apnews.myway.com/article/20110511/D9N512K00.html WASHINGTON (AP) - Under pressure from more than five dozen House lawmakers, the Navy late Tuesday abruptly reversed its decision that would have allowed chaplains to perform same-sex unions if the Pentagon decides to recognize openly gay military service later this year. In a one-sentence memo obtained by The Associated Press, Rear Adm. Mark Tidd, chief of Navy chaplains, said his earlier decision has been "suspended until further notice pending additional legal and policy review and interdepartmental coordination." The Navy said its lawyers wanted to do a more thorough review of the legal decision that allowed Navy chaplains to receive training to perform civil unions on military bases, but only in states where same-sex unions are legal. Military training to apply the new law allowing gays to serve openly began earlier this year and is expected to be completed by midsummer. House members wrote to Navy Secretary Ray Mabus to object to the Navy's initial ruling, saying the service was violating the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act by appearing to recognize and support same-sex marriages.
I think that's probably OK. Gay Americans are perfectly capable of serving in the military and the correct actions have been taken to reflect that. How we view a lifelong partnership between a same-sex couple is still far up in the air. We shouldn't have our armed forces sanctioning one form or another until the final form comes together. It will take time and cause turmoil for millions of people, but the outcome will be better in the end. If joining the Navy became the sure-fire way to get a legally recognized partnership, it would make a mockery of both institutions.
The Navy has come a long way from when I was in it. We used to toss gays overboard (not at sea, but docked) and made sure they'd miss the boat and have to either stand mast or eat a big chicken dinner.
