Ha Ha. Stupid Clippers traded #1 pick for Mo Williams!

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by KingSpeed, May 17, 2011.

  1. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63,207
    Likes Received:
    22,399
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    Amazing. Another stupid decision by the Clippers.
     
    julius likes this.
  2. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They did it to save money mostly.
     
  3. RoyToy

    RoyToy Clown Town

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,977
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    83
    There's already a draft thread
     
  4. tlongII

    tlongII Legendary Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,249
    Likes Received:
    11,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Beaverton, Oregon
    Mo Williams makes more money than the #1 pick will.
     
  5. julius

    julius Living on the air in Cincinnati... Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    45,197
    Likes Received:
    34,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Sales Manager
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Didn't they get rid of Baron Davis' anchor contract?
     
  6. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Next two years:
    Mo Williams - 17 million
    Baron Davis - 28.8 million
     
  7. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    That's a hopelessly stupid move.
     
  8. 3RA1N1AC

    3RA1N1AC 00110110 00111001

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    20,918
    Likes Received:
    5,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    baron is gonna get fat as fuck
     
  9. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ha ha that is so funny. Clippers find another way to screw up a #1 pick.
     
  10. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,353
    Likes Received:
    145,581
    Trophy Points:
    115
    It could be worse, they could have used it to draft the Next Great NBA Center.
     
  11. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    Look at the good side of Kroc saving $11.8M. For an extra year, your Egg McMuffin doesn't get downsized to stay at $1.00. If you're a big hen, your life just got extended.
     
  12. mook

    mook The 2018-19 season was the best I've seen

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,309
    Likes Received:
    3,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Buy a recipe binder at CookbookPeople.com
    Location:
    Jolly Olde England
    Here's a post I found with a little analysis (from a Clipper fan): http://www.clipsnation.com/2011/5/1...-NBA-draft-lottery-los-angeles-clippers-trade

    Basically, the Clips rolled the dice on a 2.8% chance of winning the lottery in exchange for dumping $11 mil (and Baron Davis). They got unlucky, but it was a dumb trade even if the pick isn't #1. Just giving up such a valuable asset to save some dough....this is exactly the kind of bullshit money-saving move I'm so glad our owner never engages in (and sometimes preys on), which makes me appreciate Paul Allen all the more.
     
  13. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,713
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    I don't get why they didn't ANY protection whatsoever. Even top 3 protection could have saved them.
     
  14. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    They couldn't protect the pick because they had a protected first rounder the previous year. I just read about it on O-live.
     
  15. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/clippers-could-not-have-protected-pick
     
  16. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    20,003
    Likes Received:
    17,234
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    Yes but this is so funny/stupid it deserves it's own thread! :lol:
     
  17. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They did pretty good with their last #1 pick.

    BNM
     
  18. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You do realize Donald Sterling owns the Clippers, not the Kroc family. They own the Padres. Sterling is a real estate magnate, not a fast food billionaire.

    BNM
     
  19. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,714
    Likes Received:
    13,127
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Meh, could have put in some sort of protection. Next year's pick is top 10 protected I believe. So they could have made this one top 5 protected, adn then 10 or above protected. OR, could have put protection on the Timberwolves pick they have next season instead. Could and should have worked around it.
     
  20. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They can't change the protection on the Timberwolves pick after its already been traded.

    I'm sure they'd have rather given a pick multiple years down the line with future protections but that wasn't as valuable.
     

Share This Page