If Roy has played his last game as a Blazer

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by SlyPokerDog, May 20, 2011.

  1. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,375
    Likes Received:
    145,601
    Trophy Points:
    115
    is his body of work large enough and good enough here to retire his number?

    Based on the standards the Blazers have used in the past I'd have to say yes.
     
  2. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I say hell no.

    Portland has retired too many numbers as is. The only numbers that should be retired are Walton and Drexler.....MAYBE Lucas. That's it.
     
  3. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,375
    Likes Received:
    145,601
    Trophy Points:
    115
    I agree that the standard used to retire numbers by the Blazers in the past have been way too low but Roy was a better player then half those up there.
     
  4. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just because the organization made a mistake and retired the numbers of a lot of the 77 team doesn't mean they are justified in retiriing Roy's number now. The only two jerseys that legimately deserve to be retired are Drexler and Walton.
     
  5. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,403
    Likes Received:
    6,325
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did they retire Jim Paxsons number? He was a multiple time all-star in Portland.
     
  6. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly. No
     
  7. Masbee

    Masbee -- Rookie of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I agree as well, the Blazers have been adsurdly loose with their numbers retired criteria.

    Based on old criteria, Roy should have his number retired.

    Based on a more traditional, and sensible criteria - NO.
     
  8. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,375
    Likes Received:
    145,601
    Trophy Points:
    115
    After Drexler and Walton isn't Roy the 3rd or 4th greatest Blazer ever?
     
  9. Harry's Raincoat

    Harry's Raincoat Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    620
    Trophy Points:
    93
    One could/should argue that Petrie, Lucas, Paxson, Porter, and Buck would all be in the mix with Walton and Drexler for "greatest" title.
     
  10. Harry's Raincoat

    Harry's Raincoat Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    620
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Using the standard of our past, yes, Roy should have #7 in the rafters someday. No street names please.
     
  11. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. I'd rank Porter ahead of him and Lucas for what he accomplished. Roy is in a class with Paxson and Vandeweghe however.
     
  12. Rhal

    Rhal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    12,997
    Likes Received:
    2,756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    Portland
    For game 4 of the Dallas series yea.

    In all seriousness we have retired to many jerseys and Roy deserves to be in the rafters more then a few of the ones hanging up but we have retired to many for not very good reasons, so if you just look at his basketball resume for u then I think the answer is no. If you take into account that he almost single handily changed the reputation of the blazers and took us out of a dark period in Blazers history, then that has more weight then his ROY 3 All-star appearances, All NBA third team, all NBA second team.
     
  13. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cliff Robinson was our leading scorer on multiple teams that made the playoffs and lost in the first round. I'd never consider him close to worthy of getting his numbe retired. It's not Cliffs fault he hit his prime following a period of title runs but Roy hit his prime after the dark years.

    Too bad we can't unretire some of those old players, I mean Larry Steele? Change them to being part of the "Wall of Honored Champions" somewhere in a corner so it looks ok PR wise.

    Absolutely no to Roy being retired; he had an all-star season leading the team to 41-41 followed by one complete season where he carried the team but the result was a dissapointing first round exit. You shouldn't get your number retired from great play in only a single losing playoff series.
     
  14. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
  15. anonymous gambler

    anonymous gambler Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I'd say yes, with a slight hesitation given the short time he played for us- but he was our best player for 4 years and led us out of the woods back into being a good team.
     
  16. 3RA1N1AC

    3RA1N1AC 00110110 00111001

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    20,918
    Likes Received:
    5,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    he is more than a player, he was a shining bastion of light leading us out of the depths of the fireswamp

    he made everyone proud to be a blazer fan again, that counts for alot id say

    i say yes
     
  17. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Damn right you retire his number! End of story!
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  18. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,375
    Likes Received:
    145,601
    Trophy Points:
    115
    So far it appears that it's 50-50 on whether to retire Roy's number so if that is how the majority of fans feel the Blazers will retire his number eventually.
     
  19. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,648
    Likes Received:
    20,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    No.

    Edit: In fact, the more I think about it, the more ridiculous it sounds.
     
  20. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    No. I agree with those who say only Walton and Dexler should have their numbers retired by the Blazers.
     

Share This Page