Baron Davis?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by McNicholicious, Jun 22, 2011.

  1. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well when I heard that Chad Buchanan was going to be the interim GM and he openly confessed that his biggest weakness is "falling in love with his own guys" I pretty much guessed that this kind of thing would happen.
     
  2. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,589
    Likes Received:
    56,023
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    He shouldn't be.
     
  3. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    62,933
    Likes Received:
    22,135
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    Actually, three years ago, Baron Davis was averaging 21 ppg, 8 apg, 4 rpg, and 2 spg. And only a year before that, he averaged 25 ppg in the playoffs and he won a round, something Miller has never done. When he is motivated, he can play like a top 5 player in the league. He was excited about the Clippers but then Elton Brand left him at the altar and he stopped caring, I think. I would love having Baron Davis around. The lazy version of Baron produces about the same as Andre Miller. Maybe Baron would get excited playing for a playoff team again. I'm in.
     
  4. UKRAINEFAN

    UKRAINEFAN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    14,686
    Likes Received:
    11,873
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    un-retired
    Location:
    Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Ukraine
    Miller, Camby, Batum and our #21 for Davis, Sessions, JJ Hickson and #4. Then I'd try to trade down with the #4 if I think I can get Jonas Valanciunas (franchise center of the future) at 7,8 or 9. And hopefully pick up another pick in the teens to get a pf. Some say that Cleveland took on Davis' contract to get a draft pick (and so wouldn't be interested in salary dump) , not sure if that is true since at the time the pick was expected to be 7 or 8; anyway by now their thinking could have changed.
     
  5. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think you actually supported that claim: they took Davis to get the #8 pick; why would they give up a better pick to get rid of him? Now, if they were getting Batum and shedding Davis' contract, then maybe the 4 might be up for grabs, but in that case, I doubt they'd give up Hickson.
     

Share This Page