Should we go after Millsap? (Using matthews?)

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by shamelessblazer, Jun 22, 2011.

  1. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    So it seems like Utah is in a bit of a bind here. I know there are rumors that they're looking for the PGOTF this draft, but unless they have a deal lined up with Harris, they should make a move, also do we know if they're that enamored with Kemba or Knight? It seems like they might want to add a center, seeing as they only have Jefferson (a 4/5) and two 4's who want to start in Millsap and Derick Favors. I could see them going after Kanter or the other C highly ranked and then grabbing Jimmer with the #12 pick.

    If they were to take a C, it sure seems like Millsap should be available, and seeing as they have no decent 2's at the moment, and there are none highly ranked in the draft, maybe they'd want to take Matthews back. Both have similar contracts I believe (that decrease significantly from here on out), Matthews was a fan favorite and fit their system well, and here he won't get tons of minutes IF we keep Roy. We could use a little more toughness, and Lamarcus can play 5.

    POR: Miller/Roy/Wallace/Millsap/Aldridge
    bench: draft pick b/u PG, Camby, Batum, Oden(?) etc.

    I wouldn't mind following it with a trade w/Minnesota and possibly grab back Webster after sending Rudy, filler, and a prospect their way.
     
  2. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No.

    The gaping hole at the 2 is more serious than the hole at the 4/5 spot if we were to lose Wessy Wes.
     
  3. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Is it really that gaping? We'd still have Roy (kind of), but Batum would be better off at 2 than three, he guards 1's a lot of the time anyways, and with Wallace at 3 there aren't a ton of minutes anyways. Besides, Millsap could play spot minutes at the 3 too. Especially if we got Webster back, which would be very easy I think, the backup three spot is taken care of.

    Rudy/Claver/filler? to Minnesota for Webster/future pick

    Miller/Roy/Wallace/Millsap/Aldridge
    Darius Morris*/Batum/Webster/Camby/Oden

    I think depending on Roy and Oden (of course) but even with mild consistent contributions from both that's a very good team with lots of versatility.
     
  4. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Batum can't create any type of offense whatsoever; he would not be a good shooting guard.
     
  5. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I would argue batum can create as well as Matthews, especially when in a situation not to defer to players around him.
     
  6. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,974
    Likes Received:
    57,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    If you're right, and Utah chooses to move Millsap, I think they could probably get more than Wes. There's always the possibility that they are still enamored with him, but I think a quality young big like Millsap would bring more than Matthews.
     
  7. JDC

    JDC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,501
    Likes Received:
    3,372
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Deference has always been Nic's mentality throughout his playing days, even as a youngster, so I don't think his role has much to do with what we see from him.

    To compare their skills, I will agree that Batum is the better passer, but only slightly.

    Both aren't that great slashers either, but at least Matthews has the strength and aggressiveness to drive and finish through contact on a semi-consistent basis.

    Really interested to see how serious Nic is about getting stronger this off-season. It would help his game quite a bit.
     
  8. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Neither player is good at creating for themselves, but Matthews works a lot better off the ball and generally puts himself in better situations to score.
     
  9. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,766
    Likes Received:
    26,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    So we'd be swapping the player Utah wouldn't match for the player they would?
     
  10. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,775
    Likes Received:
    27,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We should only go after good players if the other team doesn't want to get anything out of the deal? Like SA. How dare they ask us to take a below average contract back when they are trying to trade us their 29 year old 3 time NBA all-star PG.
     
  11. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,974
    Likes Received:
    57,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I know, right? :lol:
     
  12. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Or the player they almost matched but didn't because they had another young SG next to him for the player that they have one more talented, and one with more potential at the same position.
     
  13. BoBoBREWSKI

    BoBoBREWSKI BURP!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    5,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW
  14. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I don't understand why Utah would want to trade Millsap if they took a center.

    Because it would bump Jefferson over to the 4?

    I think most teams like having more than two serviceable big guys.

    Ed O.
     
  15. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,775
    Likes Received:
    27,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They have Derek Favors as well
     
  16. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Good point, and one that had slipped my mind.

    I still don't think they're going to be looking to move Millsap. I'd imagine they'd let him play some 3 before doing that.

    Ed O.
     
  17. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    The thing is they'll likely take Kanter (giving them another big), or Williams (duplicating Millsap). There's a chance they take Knight, but I see them gambling on Jimmer being there at 12 instead.
     
  18. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,974
    Likes Received:
    57,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I think it's very possible that they move Millsap, however I don't think Matthews is enough to get it done. What else would we be willing to offer them though?
     

Share This Page