Clinton asks Congress, whose side are you on?

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by PapaG, Jun 23, 2011.

  1. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20110623/D9O1A3VO0.html

    Hypocrisy at its best.

    [video=youtube;4CzteDucRHo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CzteDucRHo[/video]

    Also, the GOP and Dems only want the administration to use the proper protocol for Libya, not just make things up on the go.
     
  2. MrJayremmie

    MrJayremmie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,438
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Obama admin taking a page out of Bush's neocon playbook.
     
  3. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    It's like watching children fighting on a playground.
     
  4. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Clinton says Congress is free to raise objections...

    Sorry that you misunderstood what she actually said.
     
  5. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm interested to see what happens in this topic...

    First, Congress seems to be within their rights to demand the President come to them with a request for action in Libya. (I say "seems to be" b/c one could make the argument that he's already "scaled back" the inital military action, but that's for another thread). I saw on the news today that the House voted "against the conflict" but voted to still keep paying for it. I'm not a parliamentarian, I don't know exactly what that ends up meaning.

    That said, it seems as if at least the House (and depending on the McCain/Kerry bill, probably the Senate) doesn't a) want the President to do what he's doing and b) think it's legal for him to continue doing so. IF he's abusing his powers as C-i-C, does that set him up for stuff like impeachment?
     
  6. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Raising objections = having your patriotism/loyalty questioned by Hillary Clinton.

    Sorry you misunderstood what her comments actually mean.
     

Share This Page