If everything that is reported it true, the Blazers traded Jerryd Bayless (and no replacement last year) for Nolan Smith. Thoughts?
I guess we'll see how bad Smith sucks before we write this post mortem ... but my gut feeling isn't great.
Bayless is still a very good prospect, and he's reasonably experienced now. He's likely, IMO, to be the started in Toronto next year. I wonder how much Nolan Smith will get off the bench. Ed O.
Are we talking about Bayless in that thread? Would posters reasonably expect to find information and opinions about Bayless in that thread? I don't think so. So, no. Ed O.
Nolan Smith is lockdown defense at the very least. Bayless is an alligator-armed combo guard thats in denial about his ability. I take Smith.
I just don't understand this pick. Smith is a combo guard who shoots 45% from the field with elite talent at Duke, and is a 37% shooter from the NCAA 3-point line. I think this pick is an admission that trading Bayless was a mistake, and they hope Smith can be the same sort of spark off of the bench. Smith can create his own offense, like Bayless.
Bayless had a 6'3.5" wingspan when he was measured, and Smith has a 6'5.5" wingspan. I don't think that difference is substantial enough to really matter much. Ed O.
Every small guard picked in the 20s is "lock-down" to you. I don't think it really matters, anyhow, if a team has a small "lock-down" guard off of the bench. The Blazers struggle to get consistent offense from their bench, and they struggle to rebound. I don't think either area of concern was addressed with this pick. I'm still hoping he is traded for Faried, somehow.
I think you'd prefer just one thread. It's all Blazers, after all. I think that you're wrong. And it's been this way for years and years and I don't think we're going to change just because you keep complaining. Sorry. Ed o.
I'd have rather had Shelvin Mack to replace Bayless. He pulled two undermanned teams to the NCAA title game.