http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/6995632/nba-player-rankings-141-160 Calling Bull to the Pucky on this one. 30 teams with five starters makes 150 players. Rudy should be outside of those, not counting all of the players I would take over him coming off the bench.
Either you're right, or these 91 voters are right. http://espn.go.com/nba/notebook/_/id/6853955/nba-player-rankings-contributors Tough call.
There are teams he'd start for. Ergo, he could be a top-150 player. Just because he shouldn't break rotation on a championship level team doesn't mean he can't be a starter anywhere. There's always some team with the right system and level of desperation. See Ime Udoka.
Nate McMillan, an un-versatile specialist, gets nothing out of many good players. He covers his tracks by ruining them so they aren't any better with their next coach. John Wooden used to do the same with guards. They would enter UCLA as the country's best high school guards. After 4 years of deferring to big men, they had lost all their fancy moves and flopped at pro tryouts.
Where would WNBA players fit into the rankings? Telfair can't beat this one. http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ba...;_ylt=A0PDk_ENOn1OXjEAggW8vLYF?urn=nba-wp8773
Wesley Matthews is exactly #100. http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/7029902/nba-player-rankings-91-100 Should he be? http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/page/5-on-5-110928/#nbarank-debates-higher