Resignation over flawed paper "debunking" man-made global warming

So the APS is secretly for AGW? Maybe it's a ploy to cash in on the big climate hoax dollars.

 

I read the last CERN article Denny posted, sounds like they proved exactly what all long-term climate models show. CERN is not anti-AGW, and you need to stop the appeals to authority. The whole point of this discussion is you lose either on: (1) whether AGW exists, (2) the solution to AGW, or (3) whether warmer temperatures kill a higher amount of people anyway. And there are some other questions always left unanswered.

 

Good on you HK! Why don't you elaborate on how Dr. Kirby's research proves "exactly what all long-term climate models show". I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on this.

 

Looks like you're blowing it again in other words.

Yeah use the search function buddy, it is located in the top right. Once again you just ignored what I said. Lol.

1. AGW has to be proven.
2. Your "solutions" for AGW are nonsensical, and I have superior ones that are not as ignorant.
3. Can you even prove AGW is bad?
4. Is 400 PPM of CO2 abnormal for the earth?

Etc.

You tried to shrug off the CERN findings before, but Denny pointed out your weird analysis.

 

Is English your first language?

I'm asking a serious question. I posts in Japanese forums from time to time and I sometimes mistake what people are trying to say.

 

No I was just posting informally. I'm a bit tired. ;]

First you bitch like a whiny little guy about my fun jab, then you bitch about making fun of Jon Stewart. What a fucking hypocrite. Just answer my previous post and move along.

If Agw is real, then your solutions for it are nonsensical. Your argument failed on various levels even if you can prove that AGW is occurring. Cap and trade doesn't address the problem and you're annoying me.

 

Geez, you sound like a sensitive guy.

I admitted to the jab. When did I bitch at you about making fun of a comedian? Link?

It's hard debating with you because most of the time I don't know what you're talking about.

You said "you need to stop the appeals to authority". What authority have I appealed to? Link?

You say my '"solutions' are nonsensical". What solutions have I proposed? Link?

You said "You tried to shrug off the CERN findings" when I said it was an excellent study. LINK

You said "The facts are I have laid out several dimensions in which your argument fails" when you're arguing AGW existence and I'm arguing the politics of science. We're not even on the same page.

 

I believe in constructive criticism bluefrog, but you kind of took a cheap shot I thought. So now I am going to have fun with this.

No problem.

http://sportstwo.com/threads/193299-Once-a-fringe-candidate-Paul-shaping-2012-race?highlight=sodium

So what is the solution to AGW? I'm assuming you believe in cap and trade.... If that is the case, then you have a fucking stupid solution.

Well I post informally at this board and I'm a little lazy. You tried to get cute with me though, so lets act cute. This is a fun argument now, it was boring before.

The last post you made to Denny was an appeal to authority.......

 

I was falsely swayed by the 99% of climatologists who say there's a manmade problem. Now that one loudmouth conservative quit, I see I better change sides.

Oops. Did I just appeal to authority? Claiming to be in the majority is the conservative's most-used technique of argument.

Speaking of appealing to authority, it seems that in every other post, Huevon says, "See Denny's post" or "As Denny said,..."

 

Bullshit, I just asked this guy straight up what his solutions are.

Whatever dude, you assume everyone that disagrees with you is neoconservative. That's simply not the case.

Why was I defending immigrants in that other thread? And I'm pro drugs.

 

Because you're a right-wing Mexican who wants to suck Bluefrog off. This is obvious.

 

Slanderish, I said I want him to deepthroat me. Get it right please.

Right wingers are obsessed with fences and militarism. That's very different from what I believe in.

 

You have an amazing memory, that was 7 weeks ago! Although you ended up agreeing with me in that thread. (boner time!)

I don't appreciate being called "weak", "annoying ", "whiny little guy", "failure", "hypocrite", or "one of the weakest and people around here". If you want to debate the issues, I'm game. I'm not interested in trashing talking, name calling or debating with someone that goes back and changes his posts to support his position.

I'll get back to your other points later. I'm busy

 

I do have an amazing memory, thanks.

Nope, I treat people the way they treat me.

if you want to drop this discussion, that's fine with me.

 

Huevon's leaving because I'm here!

It's okay, I understand.

 

You're not upsetting me jlprk. :/

I'm not hear just to trash talk, if bluefrog wants to discuss this topic seriously, I'm cool with that. ;] I do not mind.

 

Does anybody want to actually talk science?

*crickets* ... *crickets* ... *crickets* ... *crickets* ... *crickets* ... *crickets* ...