Batum ready to replace Roy at 2 guard

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by SlyPokerDog, Nov 28, 2011.

  1. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,683
    Likes Received:
    13,087
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oden's cap hold doesn't matter much for LT purposes, outside of mini MLE or full MLE. LT is calculated at the end of the season. Right now, with his 8.8 QO and with Brandon, and with estimates for rookies and overseas rights, we are at 80 million. That also includes Patty, Claver and Freeland. LT is roughly 70. Cutting Brandon gets that to 65. Under the LT. Shaving 10 million of luxury tax dollars. But, once the season began, holds for Patty, Claver and Freeland come off, with Oden at his QO, we'd be under 78. Roughly 8 million in LT payments. So cutting Roy saves his 15 salary and 8 in LT. And most we can sign a guy for is 5 million, not a 15m replacement.
    Not sure where your figures are from.
     
  2. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    29,150
    Likes Received:
    9,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    This cap-hold talk will surely make HCP's head explode.
     
  3. RoyToy

    RoyToy Clown Town

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,977
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    83
    How much higher is the luxury tax # to the salary cap #?
     
  4. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I was just pointing out that you have to pay Roy, like a tax, if you cut him, period. LOL at you guys getting Wade, but I was making the point that it's really expensive to pay him not to play.

    And http://www.hoopsworld.com/portland-trail-blazers-team-salary/

    It says you're $73M without the cap holds (and without Mills at all or Oden at all). With those two at their QOs, it's $83.5M which is $13.5M over last year's cap. Your #21 pick costs you $1.2M.

    $14.7M over the LT.

    You also have cap holds for Koponen, Diener, Claver, and Freeland.

    Now you're close to $18M.
     
  5. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Last year, about $12.5M.
     
  6. RoyToy

    RoyToy Clown Town

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,977
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    83
    It's not like a tax, though.

    You're paying him either way, and if you cut him you're not paying any extra $ on him. If you keep him, you are.

    One way is less $ than the other. Pretty simple.
     
  7. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Forget about the capholds, that only matters if the Blazers were below the soft salary cap line which they won't be this year no matter who's coming back. The only calculation that matters is total salary, how far over the luxury tax they'll be if they keep Roy and how far below they could be if he's off the cap.
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2011
  8. Masbee

    Masbee -- Rookie of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Right.

    Until we can get the new CBA to look at and better info I have been rounding off to appx $10mil lux tax bill to retain Roy.

    Keep Roy: $15mil sal, $10mil lux tax
    Amnesty Roy: $15mil sal, $0 lux tax, -$1mil offset, $5 MLE replacement player

    Just doesn't seem likely the team will save huge money if they wait 1 year.

    However, if through the agents back channels, it seems the Blazers can swing a trade for young quality starting caliber player, they should consider cutting Roy now (assuming that is needed to make it all work).
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2011
  9. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    It's obviously best, money-wise for the owner to just cut him and sign nobody. I already posted that.

    But it is like a tax. Similar to the luxury tax, you're paying HIM instead of the league. As I pointed out, IF you could sign another $15M worth of players (or player), it'd be like having a $2 tax, or $45M cost.



    the best info I can find is $14.5M over, $500K under (cut Roy). That assumes Oden signs for the minimum QO, and Patty Mills the same. And that you don't sign anyone else or trade for a player that brings $500K more salary in than out.
     
  10. RoyToy

    RoyToy Clown Town

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,977
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I just don't see it like that at all.
     
  11. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hey Mr. Bulls fan, I guarantee you Patty doesn't sign here. He's stuck in China for the year.
     
  12. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    You going to replace him with a player for $1.2M or less?
     
  13. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nolan Smith but he should already be in your salary sheets.
     
  14. OdenHoF

    OdenHoF Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2010
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    WATCHING BLAZERS
    Location:
    OREGON
    Also, you mentioned Koponen on "cap holds"? I believe the Mavericks own his contract now. FWIW.
     
  15. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    He is.
     
  16. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anyone understand that clause that said a team had to spend at least 85% of it's cap room? That means if a bunch of your players contracts expire, and they sign with other teams, you're forced to go out and get FAs and potenially way overpay them to get up to 85%?
     
  17. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or just assume contracts in a trade. There are always teams looking to shed players.
     
  18. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,683
    Likes Received:
    13,087
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wouldn't bother to use hoopsworlds salary info, personally. But they seem to behigher on camby and Wallace than I have seen elsehwere. Also, like mentioned above, you included Koponen, who we no longer have. On top of that, and I could be wrong, but I believe if you waive a player, and he signs elsewhere, the amount of money he signs for can go off of what you owed him. So, when we cut Steve Francis, and he was signed for a million, we saved a million. I believe by signing in LA, we don't have to pay on Gomes anymore, since his salary there offsets what we would have owed him. I could be wrong.
    Regardless, I think you're still a bit high on the numbers. And I don't know why you mention replacing him with 15 million worth of players to say 45 million. That makes no sense. One, because we can't, and also because we don't have to. If we replaced him with 30 million dollars worth of players, it'd be 60! But that doesn't matter.
     
  19. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    The numbers are similar to the ones on shamsports.com as well as on S2.

    I already pointed out that in the $45M scenario, if Roy signed somewhere else for $5M, it'd still cost the team $40M to replace his salary with one or more players that add up to $15M in salary.
     
  20. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,683
    Likes Received:
    13,087
    Trophy Points:
    113
    shamsports still has Rudy on our roster. No good. S2 says it is from storytellers, but doesn't match up, and also has Rudy on our roster. As well as Pendergraph and Koponen. No good.

    And I still don't understand the 15 million dollar player point of your post. To show how much more it would cost? Why? We can't bring in a 15, 20 or 30 million dollar guy to replace him.
     

Share This Page