Blazers only NBA team to "lose" in new CBA

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Shooter, Nov 30, 2011.

Moderators: 6

Moderators

  1. BrianFromWA
  2. Chris Craig
  3. Darkwebs
  4. Ed O
  5. PtldPlatypus
  6. SlyPokerDog
Page 2 of 2
  1. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    You forgot subterfuge.
     
    PapaG, Nov 30, 2011
    #21
  2. PHXBlazer1

    PHXBlazer1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    7,093
    Likes Received:
    4,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Eugene
    I am Henry Abbott and you are all right! Right?
     
    PHXBlazer1, Dec 1, 2011
    #22
  3. Masbee

    Masbee -- Rookie of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    We already had a thread about this.

    I am not sure what got up Henry Abbott's butt, but he is flat out wrong.

    "high salaries".

    The only long, big deals the Blazers carry are:

    LaMarcus (not a mediocre player)

    Brandon (contract will be ditched in amnesty next year if not this year)

    Well, there goes his lazy writing.

    As they say, Garbage In = Garbage Out.

    He claims Blazers are "losers" with the new CBA, which is silly.

    Under what type of CBA would the Blazers have been listed as a "winner"?
     
    Masbee, Dec 1, 2011
    #23
  4. 3RA1N1AC

    3RA1N1AC 00110110 00111001

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    20,918
    Likes Received:
    5,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    if the cba said "there is no luxury tax"
     
    3RA1N1AC, Dec 1, 2011
    #24
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page