Are People Sleeping On Wallace and Mathews?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by LameR, Dec 23, 2011.

  1. LameR

    LameR Ha Seung-Jin Approved!

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Soccer Coach
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    I just think it's interesting how often Wallace gets overlooked. What are you guys expecting from him this year? I felt like after 5-6 games with us last year, he found his groove and was our 2nd best player by far. Then I hear people talking about clearing the way for Batum, who has done a decent job, but it's a little odd to me that people seem so quick to want to ship a guy of all-star, all-defense caliber. Is it the injury history? Is it the unconventional style of play? With Roy gone, and someone other than just Aldridge needing to step up, I could definitely see Wallace being that guy, especially being reunited with Felton.

    As far as Mathews goes, I don't expect him to become anything incredible, but the guy can shoot the three great, and it may be even better with Felton facilitating.

    I think both of these guys have a bigger load on their shoulders this year with Roy and Oden gone. Batum and Crawford will fill in for some scoring, but I wouldn't be surprised to see Wallace average 17-20 ppg. Mathews, I think 14-17 is reasonable. The thing I love about both of these guys is how hard they play. I hope it doesn't result in injuries, but it definitely is a possibility. What do you guys think?
     
  2. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,993
    Likes Received:
    57,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I think a little bit, but mostly it's people looking at his age and the fact that a lot of people don't expect much out of this team this year.
     
  3. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree on Wallace. I think fans have a tendency to love the young guys before they've proven themselves, and underestimate veterans as they enter their 30's. Remember how many years we heard Outlaw is "still only 22" or Martell would be a junior next year if he went to college. Heck, even Miles was younger then Batum is now and had accomplished more on the court when we gave him that horrible contract. I'm hoping we don't make the same mistake with Batum.

    Teams and fans continuously overvalue their own youth and assume the best case development scenarios, when if you look at historical data the chance of a mid-tier player becoming an all-star is extremely low. You just don't see wing players in their 4th year in the league develop from a bench player to a stud starter. It’s far more likely a 27 year old all-star, as Gerald was, continues to perform as an above average starter into his mid 30’s.
     
  4. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,780
    Likes Received:
    27,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am sleeping on Wallace and Matthews because we have an offense that relies on jump shots, and Wallace doesn't shoot really well. Matthews is a reserve forced to play a starters role
     
  5. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    Yes! I've noticed the same about Gerald Wallace (not so Matthews).

    This board has forgotten that Wallace was 3 times as good as Batum, after he arrived late last season. There was no comparison, and the board was unanimous. Now they're all eager to dump Wallace to make time for the inferior Batum. (e.g. for nothing but draft picks.)

    Some even want Batum to start at guard! Yeah right!

    I don't see a similar eagerness to dump Matthews.
     
  6. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,986
    Likes Received:
    17,207
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    +1

    His success (on offense) will be determined by our ball and player movement.
     
  7. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Another point I would make is to look at how much turnover there is on an NBA roster. LaMarcus and Batum are the only players that have played more then one full season in Portland. Most likely our players will only stick around a couple of seasons. So for those few years we have a player we need to retain the guy that gives us the best contributions now. Most likely the young guys will be on a different team years down the road.
     
  8. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,780
    Likes Received:
    27,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ya. If we can actually move the ball on offense then Wallace will be fine
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I agree with everything op said but the exception of "with oden gone". We've been living without oden pretty much his entire career. So I think that's a moot point.
     
  10. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    You sure have done a 180. Just a month ago, you were the guy always talking about Oden's return. Then you announced you were giving up. When you change, you really change.
     
  11. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63,197
    Likes Received:
    22,394
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    LameR- I agree with everything you said.
     
  12. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I, for one, haven't been "sleeping on Wallace" as much as realizing that he's more valuable around the league than he is to us long-term.

    If he's on the team, he's the starting 3 unless (until?) Nic proves he can beat him out for the spot. But if someone thinks that they'd rather have Wallace for 17 months (tops) rather than, say 4 draft picks or something, then they're welcome to him, and thank you for your service, Crash.
     
  13. DeanMoriarty

    DeanMoriarty Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Wallace has always been one of the most underrated players, especially at his position. Outside of Durant, Lebron, and Carmello, the guy is the only other "great" small forward out there. Even good scorers like Granger, Gay, or even Melo and Durant can't bring the defensive intensity that Wallace brings. Plus, he's a great rebounder for his position.

    If Melo, Bron, and Durant are Tier 1 Small Forwards, then Wallace is the best Tier 2 Small Forward in the league.

    As for Matthews, he's definitely a Tier 2 Shooting Guard but he's more like a Rudy Gay or Loul Deng than he is Gerald Wallace. Plus he plays for the Blazers. Just alone for that, he will automatically be slept on. If he ever develops a passing game, he'd be the next Joe Johnson...aka the best shooting guard of Tier 2 shooting guards. Until then, he'll be good and might even get into an all-star game or two, especially if Kobe gets injured, but people expecting anything more than that are likely to be disappointed. To me, I'm hoping he doesn't end up a John Starks type of guy who can shoot you in or out of a game because I don't know if it's just me but I can see a little bit of that in Matthews.
     
  14. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,881
    Likes Received:
    3,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is Oden excluded because he's only played partial seasons, and not enough to add up to more than one full season?

    Regardless, that's a pretty surprising stat.
     
  15. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Woah there nelly!!! I still believe that Oden will rock our rocks off. I still think he's gonna be back this season, and I am 100% looking through this world with rose colored glasses. What I'm saying is we haven't seen so far Oden, so saying "with him gone" doesn't make a difference. He's never been one yet. :)
     
  16. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ *snort* ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
     
  17. LameR

    LameR Ha Seung-Jin Approved!

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Soccer Coach
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Originally in making this thread it was solely about Wallace, but I was curious about opinions on Wes as well. He's obviously not at the same level as Wallace, but I don't think he's a tier below Batum by any means, and I read people saying Aldridge and Batum are the future.
     
  18. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe not now, but Batum has got a lot more potential.

    Ah, the P word, don't we love it.
     
  19. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    And I remembered watching Wes get like 20 points in a quarter. That's really hard to do. I think it's gonna take some time to sink in because so many of us wanted Roy back or thought Roy would eventually come back. Now that's gone, I believe new hope will sink in with Matthews. He's a great player and we should be very lucky to have him. Only 2 years in the league, he has a lot of upside.
     
  20. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He came into the league very late. He's already 25 years old. I doubt he has much upside left.
     

Share This Page