Who else but Quick would write incessantly about chemistry, worry if there's no church party atmosphere on the team, or praise players for being young and innocent (and low basketball IQ and manipulable by the Oregonian). I knew it was him, but I clicked anyway to make sure. It's HIM.
Chemistry is huge in basketball more than any other sports, outside of maybe an offensive line in football.
...and LaQueesha the late evening dancer at Exotica. Z-Bo was good for the Oregon economy. I think its why we were so apprehensive to deal him. His brother Roger sure was a class act.
I think great chemistry in guys hanging out for dinner and isn't a huge deal. The benefit is if it carries over on the court. Obviously, you don't have to like someone off the court to have great chemistry on the court. But any bit helps.
The reason I posted was that Quick harps on chemistry so much, that when I see an uncredited excerpt in the OP from an article about chemistry, I know the author is Quick without looking. To the Oregonian, building chemistry equates to fear of veterans, because uncontrollable veterans will refuse golf invitations from Quick, like Miller did. This is why they shoved Pritchard's years of building through the draft down our throats, and delayed team development. As a result of so many years of so-called rebuilding, I'm tired of worrying about off-court, church party chemistry. Just get veterans, and usually, on-court chemistry will take care of itself. If it doesn't, it's bad coaching.
Actually yesterday during the Just Casey show Quick was being interviewed and it was me who requested that he write a Behind the locker room door article. http://www.nba.com/blazers/tbtv/video.html?videoID=2693
But if Canzano were to write the same article he would claim there are major problems in the locker room because none of the players were laughing and joking after a big win but instead only solemnly watching TV.