And Atheists prove their arrogance to completely ignore the scientific testing to prove there is a God.
God didn't make them extinct, we did mostly. I still don't see why animals would need to evolve to become so complex and diverse. There is no reason animals needed to come on dry land, and there is no actual evidence that this can happen.
until jesus came and killed them all heres a little timeline dragons-----jesus----no dragons any questions?
I almost had finished reading Book #5 of the Game of Thrones series. Thanks for ruining it for me. Why don't you try putting a spoiler alert on that timeline of yours.
Okay since it was only directed to tlong and seems to be ignored by the others; I don't know why. Here is is: long said there is piles and piles of evidence to support evolution. No there isn't. Stop using DOGMA in this thread. Show me a FishaDino fossil. How about a DinoRat? What about a ReptiPrimate? Then show me multiple samples. There are millions of fossil records and not a single shred of proof of mid evolution of species. And let me add; science doesn't need one instance. It needs hundreds if not thousands out of the millions of fossils to prove to be irrefutable.
Where is all of the scientific proof the creationist scientists, of which there are many as you mentioned yesterday, have provided on the existence of god?
does god have pubes? to protect his genitals? i would guess yes, its pretty cold in space. what about eyebrows?? or eyelashes to keep crap out of his eyes? does he need big toes to keep his balance while walking? i mean, does he even walk? what about a butthole? does he have to eat? i mean, we were created in his image right?
I've given my best arguments on why I believe there is a reality outside of this universe. I believe there is plenty of evidence for God. What evidence is there that fish can grow legs and change their entire body type in order to live on land?
i hope heaven has personal thermostats, it would suck if god ran a hot temp and was always cranking the heat because he was chilly
^ my proof of God. And if those creatures are in the process of evolving then certainly there is observable evidence for it right?
Well this is very easy, and it is the same argument that Craig has pleaded to the scientific community. When you give a iron clad theory; then you must accept this theory and try and prove it wrong. How much of the science community's resources have been put on disproving this theory? What gives the community the right to discriminate this scientific request?
