Apples and Oranges. Clinton had already reversed a horrific 12-year skid and made America a super power again. And like Obama this time around, he had no serious competition from the Repubs worth mentioning.
Ideal Theoretical Candidate (100%) 2. Barack Obama* (83%) 3. Joseph Biden (67%) 4. Ron Paul* (46%) 5. Buddy Roemer* (36%) 6. Gary Johnson* (35%) 7. Robby Wells* (31%) 8. Mike Huckabee (30%) 9. Newt Gingrich* (28%) 10. Mitt Romney* (27%) 11. Jon Huntsman (26%) 12. Rick Santorum* (25%) 13. Michael Bloomberg (20%) 14. Donald Trump (20%) 15. Tim Pawlenty (17%) 16. Herman Cain (14%) 17. Michele Bachmann (13%) 18. Rick Perry (10%)
finally got around to that quiz mine was biden 87% obama 84% paul 52% interesting for sure guess i voted for the right guy according to my quiz the last time haha
[video=youtube;fit79MQwyeY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fit79MQwyeY&feature=player_embedded[/video] STOMP
Uh, you think Newt taking a Bible Belt state means the GOP is imploding? You think a Bible Belt state voting for a candidate despite their religious leanings shows a weakness for the GOP? No.
But in reality; which GOP has a chance against Obama? I still can't believe this is so hard either. Obama has completely went away from everything that got him elected in the first place. SUCKS!
Have you guys considered voting for this guy? [video=youtube;DFXXAuDK1Ao]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFXXAuDK1Ao[/video] I'd say hes around a 97% for me.
No offense, but the first question in this survey is so base-level and biased in its explanation of the the "Stimulus Act" that it didn't seem worth continuing with it. Plus, how does on "scrap" a bill that has already had its money spent?