Evidence that "Atheism" is not a sound belief

Dodging again. Yes or no. Do you discount the historians?

 

Hypothetically I agree with you. Why wouldn't I? It supports my thread. So you are saying you are god?

 

Tell Denny that. I'm not the one saying he is god. He is.

 

Yeah, we're done here. You are losing any wit or rationality you had. Fail.

 

I'm not Denny. You are god! Thank you.

 

So is that the empirical evidence you're seeking? Are you a believer now?

 

Are you talking to yourself. The prosecutors are not arguing you are god. Why would we?

 

So Denny are you God? Yes or no?

 

Mags, we are talking to a guy who thinks he's God. Does anything more need to be said?

 

Meh, I'll take your word for it if you promise me eternal salvation.

 

I think it's frustration. Of course he doesn't believe he is god. But if he says he is; it supports that atheism is not a sound belief. It's really quite simple. Remember this is a unbiased formate. As the prosecution our personal belief aren't relevant.

 

Okay camp defense has another proclamation of faith.

 

i don't dispute that most historians think it's more probable that not that the man jesus existed. i was just responding to your ignorant claim of less historical evidence for ceasar.

this thread is progressing too fast for me to keep up at the moment, trying to work at the same time : )

6 is just a straw man. atheism doesn't require that god be disproved.

 

cool, maybe you'll "win" with me and denny's proclamations.

Denny, instead of wlaking on water, can oujust turn a couple of jugs of water into wine for me. Much more worthwhile. Thanks!

 

How can 6 be a straw man? If the belief that god does not exist; then they would need evidence that god doesn't exist to make it a sound belief.

 

It's not about winning for me. You want to make this black or white but it isn't. There is evidence that's presented and anyone reading can make their own conclusion. I still don't know why you keep labeling it like that.