Steve Nash: Trade to Portland would be a "terrific situation"

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by KingSpeed, Feb 27, 2012.

  1. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    26,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    Yes.

    Here. (Somebody on Blazers' Edge linked to it.)
     
  2. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I have a feeling that Aldridge is doing some recruiting for Nash. Maybe had a convo about would he stay in Portland if they traded for him. Regardless, if there is any shot at getting Nash without trading Batum or Aldridge; we should pull the trigger.
     
  3. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Honestly, all you people hoping for Nash should be hoping we get him in the off-season.

    The best chance we have of getting Nash is in free agency.
     
  4. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    If we ended up using our cap space this summer on Nash I wouldn't be disappointed, but I'd still like to make a run at DWill.
     
  5. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wouldn't mind either. He's another stop gap, albeit a very good stop gap.

    For those thinking Nash would re-up here, if that's what you believe, then there's not much point to trading for him anyways. We could keep our assets and also get Nash for free.
     
  6. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Yes but I think he stays loyal to Phoenix. He won't pull a LJ and leave his team hanging. He would want them to get something in return. At least that's how I see him.
     
  7. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,974
    Likes Received:
    17,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    Agreed, this is my hope as well.

    Nash gets a graceful exit, and the Blazers get to keep their core.

    You don't have to get them something in return to not pull a Lebron! what LBJ did was ridiculous. Simply not demanding a trade and playing out the life of a contract is loyal IMO
     
    Last edited: Feb 29, 2012
  8. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I think he realizes that it's time for Phoenix to move on and rebuild.

    Also, when you start talking about loyalty, the guy pretty much bailed on Dallas.
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Dallas wouldn't pay him. That's a much different story IMO. He wanted to stay, but they wouldn't offer him the contract he deserved.
     
  10. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Couldn't we offer cash with a trade as well? I know it doesn't hold value, but I seem to remember that you can include cash as an incentive for a deal. Maybe if Allen forks a little more money, they maybe able to get him with less trading pieces.
     
  11. Masbee

    Masbee -- Rookie of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    FALSE.

    Look up Cuban's story about how it all went down.

    Cuban: Steve, I love you, but I won't give you the MAX or anything close to it, I am worried about your health long-term (back issues).

    Steve: Dude, I want to stay in Dallas. Give me an offer. WTF?

    Cuban: It is hard to set the market for a unique player like yourself. I want you to go out, get the best offer you can, and I will match it.

    Steve: Cool.

    Steve: Phoenix is offering 6 years, $63 mil.

    Cuban: Oh, dude, that is way too high. I need a center, and I am going to spend most of that money on Eric Dampier.

    No joke people. Cuban essentially paid Dampier the money he refused to pay Nash.
     
  12. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I remembered it going down like that too.
     
  13. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Funny enough, Cuban has a ring now and Nash doesn't.
     
  14. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    How many rings would Cuban have if he kept Nash instead of giving money to Dampier? I bet many more.
     
  15. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Better question: how many MVPs would Nash have if he had stayed in Dallas? I'm betting none.
     
  16. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cuban would probably have more rings (and Nash would too by association) if he kept Nash.
     
  17. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Who cares about MVPs? Do you think Nash would instead of rings? I don't think so.
     
  18. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    The point is, Nash was a borderline All-Star on Dallas, and then suddenly became an MVP player in Phoenix. I have always suspected that his inflated numbers were due more to the system and not the player.

    Case in point: Raymond Felton

    The Mavs had a very good team with Nash, Dirk, and Finley all in their prime and they couldn't win it. What makes you think that team with Nash would have been any better than that team with Jason Kidd?
     
  19. Masbee

    Masbee -- Rookie of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Dampier didn't help get Cuban the ring, smartypants.

    As you can tell I hate those who overuse the "winning"! line.

    It is trite, bored, obnoxious and essentially worthless. Charlie Sheen is the apex of that mindset. If you aspire to be that - fantastic.

    Cuban did an excellent job of correcting his (self-admitted "terrible" mistake).

    But it took him 6 years to correct that mistake. The only players left on the Dallas team that finally won the ring were Dirk and Jason Terry. Every other player was changed, so the team had to be rebuilt in order to win the ring after the Dampier for Nash fiasco.
     
  20. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Well for one, Kidd wasn't in his prime when he won the ring and Nash was. And explain why Nash is still tearing it up at age 38?
     

Share This Page