How can you say seattle is a much better football team right now anyway? The seahawks dont have the raiders history bar none.
I didnt say "much" better. The only clear advantage the Raiders have is McFadden... and he cant stay healthy. Raiders dont have the cap space... Seahawks do. Peyton doesnt care about history. That wont help them win the next 3-5 years.
The raiders have no business getting manning. But I think its funny you say we only are clearly advantageous with mcfadden. Oakland had two quarterbacks on their roster better than tarvaris, and wehad a better record than u last yr with our best player hurt over half the yr
I was speaking from the perspective of what Manning would be looking at. He obviously doesnt care about the teams current QB situation because he would start over them. Cant argue that T.Jackson and C.Whitehurst suck ass!!! Worst QB's in the NFL. If we even had a mediocre QB, we'd probably would of had 2-3 more wins.
His criteria: 1) Will not play in the same division as his brother. 2) Warm weather or an indoor stadium. 3) VERY good and established o-line to protect him. He's fragile. 4) A good and deep core of receivers. 5) A head coach that will let him do his own thing on the field. Houston.
That too. I dont think seattle or washington with him either. I think its arizona or miami. Ill say kansas city as my dark horse since crennel apparently wants him bad.
I wonder if either Manning or Irsay ever thought that the back-loaded contract with a $28 million roster bonus in 2012 would be the reason Manning left Indy. Just a weird sequence of events ended up at this moment. Manning misses the entire season when that wasn't supposed to be the case going into camp, the team completely tanks, and sitting there is Andrew Luck, who has every attribute that a successful NFL QB needs. Smart, mobile, great arm, played in big games in college. The type of guy you can't pass on, even with a 36 year-old QB who still plays at an MVP level.