WTF are you talking about? With a quote like that, you have to tell us who said it, or at least link it.
I still maintain he will be fired upon returning from the road trip. I would like it sooner but thats gonna be the case.
Were they just speculating, or did they say they have "sources" (as if it really matters). Bringing back Blake makes even less sense with Mac gone, unless he's coming to be player-coach.
That's not a hint. That's a pretty definitive statement. The question is, was that just someone speculating, or someone with real inside information?
You don't fire the head coach on the road, or else the GM (Larry Miller in this case) or owner or both will have to do it in person so someone can take control. The assistant coach who becomes head coach wll not automatically get control over his rival assistants without the presence of a common authority. This has happened very few times in NBA history. Anyone know when?
I call bull. If Nate is getting fired, why trade for Blake? At this point, his only function in life is to make Nate feel all warm and gooey inside. He sure as hell can't play basketball anymore.
KGW is pretty good and honest on reporting. KGW would have the edge on reporting if this was true about Nate being fired. KGW won the Murrow Award in 2008 and 2011 based upon feature reporting. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTNDA_Edward_R._Murrow_Award
Paul Allen recently said that though he hadn't made the final decision about Pritchard yet, Pritchard asked to be relieved right before the draft, although he would conduct it. Pritchard did not deny this account.
They may be honest, but they barely cover sports. I watched their morning news today and they didnt mention anything about Nate being fired in their brief sports segment. They only mentioned the game vs NY and Crawford maybe being traded. If there was any truth to this, I think it would be all over OregonLive w/ Crapzano etc.