Projecting where our picks will be slated...

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by glazeduck, Mar 19, 2012.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    So if, by some miracle, we got #4 or #5 pick; which center is better? I haven't paid attention to these college kids.

    Draft Express says Drummond is better than Sullinger. Which would you take?
     
  2. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,273
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Drummond will be gone by then, most likely. He is the better prospect
     
  3. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sullinger is a below the rim, shortish, 280 pound guy with (rumored) legs of different lengths and he's had trouble staying healthy at Ohio State (sound familiar?) Drummond is a super raw 6'11" guy who blocks shots at a very high rate, has NBA level athleticism and length and is going to need some time to develop, but has a much higher celing than Sullinger.

    I'm biased, I always lean towards athletes at the center spot over "good college player" guys (Howard vs. Okafor for instance), so I'd go with Drummond.
     
  4. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Oh because draftexpress has this format: #1, Anthony Davis, #2 MKG, #3 THomas Robinson, #4 Drummond, #5 Sullinger
     
  5. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If he goes in the top three that means MKG or Thomas Robinson will slip to 4th ... I'd take either of those guys in a heartbeat (assuming we could get to 4th)
     
  6. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So? Jonathan Givony is a pretty smart guy, but last I checked he doesn't have a crystal ball.
     
  7. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I have no idea Nic... I'm asking you guys... I am using Draftexpress because I have no idea.
     
  8. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,273
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    MKG will not be a star in the NBA
     
  9. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I think we should be targeting the Thunder with those picks. They can't keep all four of Westbrook/Durant/Harden/Ibaka long-term.

    I think either Ibaka or Harden would fit nicely w/Batum & Aldridge personally.

    Ibaka for NJ's pick (if 4/5/6)? Would he be worth it? Might need to stay competitive to keep Aldridge and bigs generally take longer to develop in general. This makes Aldridge somewhat of a five, but it keeps him in the post. We can straight up absorb him w/cap space I think.

    OR

    Matthews and #12 for Harden (resigned)?

    They'd save money on Matthews cheap contract (of which we've already paid quite a bit of through that huge signing bonus). Is it enough of an upgrade for us to go through with it? Do you guys like the fit? I think Harden is extremely well rounded and it'd be fun to have that beard here.
     
  10. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I will agree with Nic on what he mentioned on another thread. I will shit if OKC trades with their division rivals; especially players at the caliber of Westbrook, Harding or Ibaka.
     
  11. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guess we'll see.
     
  12. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    We don't have any talented players that we need to keep.

    I'd shed no tears for anyone we lose to get a proven superstar or 2.
     
  13. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,588
    Likes Received:
    56,019
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Just stay away from Drummond and Barnes. Anyone else, I'm okay with in this draft. But those two give off some serious bust vibes.
     
  14. BoBoBREWSKI

    BoBoBREWSKI BURP!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    13,852
    Likes Received:
    4,998
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW
  15. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I got #4 (Beal) and #11 (Zeller)
     
  16. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,015
    Likes Received:
    14,574
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Read somewhere that Nets sat D. Williams the entire 4th quarter last night. If that's true.... NJ has suddenly decided it is going to completely tank the rest of the season, and make it that much more difficult for us to get their pick this year.

    I've been worried about this. Them tanking, keep the pick. Then, they should have a bit of cap room this offseason. Sign some new FA's (they should be fairly attractive with that new arena opening soon). We could be looking at a non-lotto pick.
     
  17. BoBoBREWSKI

    BoBoBREWSKI BURP!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    13,852
    Likes Received:
    4,998
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW
    That came up for me about 75% of the time.
     
  18. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I looked at both of them and weren't too impressed.
     
  19. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Mark my words... Tanking will not give them top 3. It will guarantee us at most #4 and least #6. Let them tank! I love it!
     
  20. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,015
    Likes Received:
    14,574
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Duly marked and noted.

    I will remember, write it down, take a picture. And yes, you will give a fuck.

    (Just to flip the script on a classic "Friday" line.)
     

Share This Page