Aldridge top vote-getter of those not making one of the All-NBA teams. Clearly, he got jobbed. http://www.nba.com/2012/news/05/24/all-NBA-teams/
Quick stat comparison between the three through basketball reference in case anyone wanted to look at it. Aldridge had the highest PER of the three with the lowest usage rate, having the highest FG%, best reb% and best blk%. Only place he finishes behind these two is team record. And market size.
Jobbed? Maybe if he had led his team to the playoffs he would have won what was nearly a tie vote for those last few slots.
Not true! In fact, it says "must spread rep around before you can rep this douchebag again!" I probably give out more "rep" than most people on here.
KL 26.0 ppg LA 21.7 ppg KL 13.3 rpg LA 8.0 rpg KL .448 fg% LA .512 fg% KL .372 3p% LA .182 3p% KL .824 ft% LA .814 ft% KL 8.4 FTA LA 5.0 FTA
Just think of how well LA would have done with an actual point guard like Rubio instead of an overweight triceretops at point.
My point was that the same people that bitched about how Love shouldn't make an all-star team or he isn't shit because he puts up these stats on a non playoff team better hold LA to the same standards.