From Draftexpress: [video=youtube;wBXAKc1itfM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBXAKc1itfM&feature=channel&list=UL[/video]
Chad made his philosophy very clear: draft best talent available, not by position ("regardless of position or age")
Maybe he misunderstood what "BPA" means... So he drafted the Best Person Available. Nolan sure is a great guy!
No, it was Nate, but as a GM you have to be able to sell PA on the right choice. That's why Chad should be nowhere near our GM job
Because, in my eyes, Chad has proved to me that he doesn't have command of the draft room that a GM needs to have. Maybe it's a grass is always greener scenario, but the others haven't shown me yet that they are failures at this very important part of the job
Did you read that piece someone linked the the other day about Clippers Gm? It was a really good read.
We don't need a rookie GM right now. We need experience, and some of the guys that have been mentioned have a lot more experience than Chad.
http://www.csnnw.com/pages/landingd...ers-are-seeking-=1&blockID=715854&feedID=8351 If Chad spends all year analyzing and ranking players in the draft, as per his job and then come draft day someone else in that room wants a player much farther down on the list (as Nolan should have been)...and he doesn't say a word or can't convince them that his rankings are accurate or doesn't have the gravitas to do so? Then no way in hell he should be the GM.... and even if Nolan wasn't his pick, which I don't necessarily believe, he obviously had Nolan Smith ranked way too high....