Consolidation threads

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Natebishop3, Jun 24, 2012.

  1. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,023
    Likes Received:
    57,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I don't like them. If there is a big rumor or actual news, post that shit. Draft threads, free agent threads, and other consolidation threads are more for posting opinions and thoughts on the overall subject. This is the same reason why I'm not a fan of the recruiting thread on the Ducks forum. They're HUGE threads and it's hard to keep up with what's going on.

    In short, if there's something big like a rumor or a trade, POST THAT SHIT.
     
  2. bigbailes

    bigbailes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    1,623
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Laredo, TX
    i agree ... i stopped reading the draft thread around page 30 and at this point don't want to wade through endless pages for a couple of nuggets of info that got tossed in there.
     
  3. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63,200
    Likes Received:
    22,399
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    Hear hear. Don't bury news in long threads.
     
  4. LameR

    LameR Ha Seung-Jin Approved!

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Soccer Coach
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    It's only a couple of pages per day (3 today). Let's not act like people posting on message boards don't have time to read 3 pages...
     
  5. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,023
    Likes Received:
    57,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    True, but if there was a rumor about the Blazers trading a pick to another team, I want that on the front page so it's the first thing I see. I don't want to click on the draft thread and maybe see it or maybe not. Opinions on players or updated mocks are totally acceptable for that kind of thread, but if something significant happens, I want to see it and talk about it in its own thread.
     
  6. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,346
    Likes Received:
    60,029
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    Fuck that! Put this is the draft thread!
     
  7. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
  8. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm about to merge this shit...
     
  9. Chuck Taylor

    Chuck Taylor BATUUUM SHAKKA LAKKA!

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,183
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Portland
    I agree with this post. This forum used to be the quickest way to check for Blazers news if I only had a few minutes. Now I use twitter, because it takes to long to check the draft thread, the trade thread and the free agent thread. I get that the big threads are here to keep things organized, but, ironically, they are the hardest to follow because they hit on so many topics simultaneously.
     
  10. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,635
    Likes Received:
    20,324
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    At this point, the draft thread is 2000 pages of the same five opinions, over and over again, and a bunch of duplicative twitters.

    IF there is any new news that's actually news, and not some hack's opinion or some crap 'leaked' by an agent to drive up his client's value, it deserves it's own thread.

    Like Batum getting his QO, for example, or if Crawchuck opts in.
     
  11. bigbailes

    bigbailes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    1,623
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Laredo, TX
    +1!
     
  12. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    The big draft thread is for expected events like the Blazers making Batum an offer. Good thing there's no separate thread for that.
     
  13. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,023
    Likes Received:
    57,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Exactly gents.... glad we agree :grin:
     
  14. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,346
    Likes Received:
    60,029
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    Fuck this. I don't want 60 new threads about every rumor. Keep that shit in one place.
     
  15. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,023
    Likes Received:
    57,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    It's called merging... and we do it when multiple people post the same news story.
     
  16. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,635
    Likes Received:
    20,324
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    We agree then! :cheers:
     
  17. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    The deciding factor in whether a thread sould be separated or merged--is it sameness or agreement? Those are 2 different things. And does this new debate deserve its own thread?
     

Share This Page