My theory on why we sold the pick

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Further, Jun 29, 2012.

  1. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,099
    Likes Received:
    4,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    PA has always been a pick buyer, not a seller, so why sell the pick this year?

    First, no player fell that they NEEDED to grab. So, instead they sell the pick. The same offseason, Batum is a RFA and the blazers plan on matching what other teams offer. But, Allen has always been known to spend and does not want to overspend in this new CBA.

    One worry is that some team will make a huge offer to batum knowing that the blazers will match and be stuck with a bad contract. by selling the pick, it signals to the rest of the league that PA is more frugle now and that they should not make an offer just to screw the blazers, because PA might just stick them with the contract.

    Justa theory
     
  2. tlongII

    tlongII Legendary Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,271
    Likes Received:
    11,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Beaverton, Oregon
    We probably felt we owed it to the Nets for fleecing them on the Gerald Wallace deal.
     
  3. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeah, because the way to assuage the feelings of a $17x Billionaire is to make him a $17.003x Billionare
     
  4. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,240
    Likes Received:
    15,729
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whatever the reason was it sounded pre-determined. Just like Mike Barrett knew we would pick Leonard, he also knew we would try to get rid of our 2nd round picks. He even mentioned dumping both. Maybe Barton being available changed that. But for what ever reason they did not want both those second round picks. I doubt PA was a factor in that strategy.
     
  5. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Decent theory, though, G.
     
  6. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,034
    Likes Received:
    29,846
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Isn't it a truism that the NBA is a business? In what business does someone "atone" for getting the better of a rival by throwing him/her/them a bone?
     
  7. Sedatedfork

    Sedatedfork Rip City Rhapsody

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,981
    Likes Received:
    4,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle
    Don't forget wasted $$ in amnestying Roy. I'm not exactly sure how much $$ insurance is picking up, but I can't imagine it was free.
     
  8. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think we figured a pick wouldn't make the roster. Id rather have seen us trade for future 2nd or stash a euro though.
     
  9. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,628
    Likes Received:
    14,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    This used to be more common. A trade happens, and then another transaction happens post-draft to UNOFFICIALLY "complete" the trade.

    This is probably what happened here. Otherwise, we would have at least gotten a future 2nd.
     
  10. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,420
    Likes Received:
    25,496
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    If I wasn't so lazy, I'd try to see what our roster looks like now. Maybe we just have too many players already, if Freeland and Clever Claver are coming over?

    barfo
     
  11. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sold the pick b/c we didn't need it. overloaded with young, unproven talent. stashing for future draft picks is similarly worthless, the cash was probably just better to have.
     
  12. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes this is what I think. With the two euros and 3 new rookies are roster is at 13. We have tons of cap space and afterwards a room exception. There would be very little chance two second rounders could make the 15 man roster.
     
  13. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I like it!

    The Blazers have been aggressive in the past so teams might be thinking about messing with the Blazers. It might just make a GM stop and think again about the offer. Also, if roster issue was a problem, wouldn't it been much more like PA to trade the second round pick and cash for a higher second round next year?

    OK . . . it's a stretch. But the way I see it, it's always good to have GOD on your side.
     

Share This Page