Your RFA preferences

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Rastapopoulos, Jul 2, 2012.

?

Fave RFA scenario

  1. We get both Hibbert and Batum (we match Minny, Indy doesn't match us)

    26 vote(s)
    89.7%
  2. We get Hibbert but not Batum (neither we nor Indy matches)

    2 vote(s)
    6.9%
  3. We miss out on Hibbert but keep Batum (both teams match)

    1 vote(s)
    3.4%
  4. We get neither (Indy matches, we let Minnesota make Batum obscenely rich)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,890
    Likes Received:
    26,229
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    What's your fave scenario?
     
  2. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is a great question. I voted A because while Batum is nothing more than a number 2 or 3 option, he's a really good number 2 or 3 option. I could easily be more than happy with option B though.
     
  3. RedHotRollin

    RedHotRollin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    What dipstick would vote for anything other than 'A'?
     
  4. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    B is a great option. Batum isn't worth anywhere close to 12 million per. Not retaining him would allow us to make a lopsided trade for a wing at the deadline and re addressing this in the off season through FA and the draft
     
  5. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That would be me. I think we can probably get a player that will give us what Batum gives us for less than he's being offered. Perhaps I'm wrong, but it's my opinion.
     
  6. RedHotRollin

    RedHotRollin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Agree with you. Don't think you're wrong.

    But Batum gives you a luxury that no other player outside the Blazer organization gives. Allows you to go over the cap to resign him because you hold his rights. Icing on top of the cake if you will. He's a pretty good talent offensively and defensively as a role player. Which is what he is.
     
  7. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I voted A, but I can pretty easily live with B ... in fact B is probably the healthier long-term outcome for this organization. I realize Paul is loaded, but entering cap hell without championship level pieces could doom this team to mediocrity for years ... also known as "more of the same."

    Maybe Lillard, <fill-in-the-blank-random-ass-shooting-guard>, Batum, LA, and Hibbert with a back-bench of Leonard, Freeland, Wesley, plus whatever other mix of wings and guards we end up keeping is enough, but that feels like a pretty thin group when you consider it has to get through the likes of OKC, just to get to LeBron and Co.
     
  8. 3RA1N1AC

    3RA1N1AC 00110110 00111001

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    20,918
    Likes Received:
    5,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    wages of wins puts batums worth right now at 11 million per, and it is safe to assume he will improve into his 20's

    and last i heard it was 4/44 anyways
     
  9. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guess I just don't see the point of going over the cap to resign him if you can get something comparable without going over. Kinda like Nik says--long-term, all things being equal, I'd rather just have the cheaper guy.
     
  10. DaLincolnJones

    DaLincolnJones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    8,319
    Likes Received:
    1,886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    hmm worst case. We match, his value is set. We play him for a year, if he blows up, we keep him. If he stays the same, have the option to keep or trade with an established market value.
     
  11. Masbee

    Masbee -- Rookie of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ok.

    Name them.
     

Share This Page