PACERS WILL MATCH ROY HIBBERT

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Draco, Jul 9, 2012.

Moderators: 6

Moderators

  1. BrianFromWA
  2. Chris Craig
  3. Darkwebs
  4. Ed O
  5. PtldPlatypus
  6. SlyPokerDog
Page 2 of 4
  1. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    PACERS WILL NOT "MATCH" HIBBERT

    David Aldridge ‏@daldridgetnt
    Indy, per source, will give Hibbert the same terms that Portland was ready to give in offer sheet, & so won't technically "match" the sheet.
     
    Mediocre Man, Jul 9, 2012
    #21
  2. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Looks like we just set the market for him so he could cash in.
     
    Nikolokolus, Jul 9, 2012
    #22
  3. john2jer

    john2jer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Well no kidding. You were dreaming if you thought Hibbert was ever going to weara a Blazers jersey. The Pacers would be dumb as rocks not to match.
     
    john2jer, Jul 9, 2012
    #23
  4. OregonHuskerMan

    OregonHuskerMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,388
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    West Linn
    Still not buying that they've made up there mind without seeing the offer.
     
    OregonHuskerMan, Jul 9, 2012
    #24
  5. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    37,276
    Likes Received:
    16,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    Re: PACERS WILL NOT "MATCH" HIBBERT

    WTF does that mean?
     
    MickZagger, Jul 9, 2012
    #25
  6. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,030
    Likes Received:
    14,606
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: PACERS WILL NOT "MATCH" HIBBERT

    If he says "No" and signs with Portland, would Indy then match?
     
    BLAZINGGIANTS, Jul 9, 2012
    #26
  7. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,686
    Likes Received:
    13,091
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: PACERS WILL NOT "MATCH" HIBBERT

    Great news, means we don't have to wait around for 3 days, and can go hunt out a new RFA NOW, or someone else. Nice move by Indy, IMO.
     
    RR7, Jul 9, 2012
    #27
  8. craigehlo

    craigehlo Elite Wing

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,200
    Likes Received:
    2,328
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They aren't cash strapped. They have the dough.
     
    craigehlo, Jul 9, 2012
    #28
  9. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    not that I want to call Aldridge a liar, but if Roy's in Portland (and he is), and he's going to sign our offer sheet (like he's projected to), then IND has to "match" term-for-term, letter-for-letter. The only way they wouldn't is to say "Hey Roy, don't sign anything with the Blazers, we'll come up with this sheet here." and he does.
     
    BrianFromWA, Jul 9, 2012
    #29
  10. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,036
    Likes Received:
    57,179
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Re: PACERS WILL NOT "MATCH" HIBBERT

    They're going to try to get him to sign their offer instead of ours.... which will no doubt be a toxic offer with a bunch of money up front.
     
    Natebishop3, Jul 9, 2012
    #30
  11. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,030
    Likes Received:
    14,606
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: PACERS WILL NOT "MATCH" HIBBERT

    Well, if he signs that with Indy.... It means we can move to Plan B immediately instead of waiting 3 days.
     
    BLAZINGGIANTS, Jul 9, 2012
    #31
  12. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That would be better if we don't have to tie up our cap space with someone we have zero chance of signing. I wonder why Indy would prefer signing him outright? Perhaps they want to take care of other free agents first then sign him on the 16th or something…
     
    Draco, Jul 9, 2012
    #32
  13. OregonHuskerMan

    OregonHuskerMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,388
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    West Linn
    If thats true, I love it. Doesn't tie up our cap.
     
    OregonHuskerMan, Jul 9, 2012
    #33
  14. Nhawz

    Nhawz Lickety Brindle

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    757
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Vancouver WA
    It means they can structure the contract on their terms instead of matching a front loaded or toxic contract the blazers would probably offer
     
    Nhawz, Jul 9, 2012
    #34
  15. OregonHuskerMan

    OregonHuskerMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,388
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    West Linn
    Re: PACERS WILL NOT "MATCH" HIBBERT

    They said same terms though - so its the exact same thing...
     
    OregonHuskerMan, Jul 9, 2012
    #35
  16. ironcrotch

    ironcrotch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,675
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    They're doing the Blazers a favor by not tying up their cap space.
     
    ironcrotch, Jul 9, 2012
    #36
  17. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why the merge?
     
    Mediocre Man, Jul 9, 2012
    #37
  18. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,036
    Likes Received:
    57,179
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Re: PACERS WILL NOT "MATCH" HIBBERT

    I'm willing to bet "same terms" means same years/amount, not the toxic offer part.
     
    Natebishop3, Jul 9, 2012
    #38
  19. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,209
    Likes Received:
    15,669
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Unless you are conspiracy lovers and you think that KP is just telling people they will give him the same amount so Portland goes after someone else instead, and then Hibbert is stuck taking what the Pacers actually do offer him.........
     
    Pinwheel1, Jul 9, 2012
    #39
  20. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    John Hollinger ‏@johnhollinger
    If Pacers sign Hibbert w/o offer sheet, can tack on non-guaranteed 5th year and time signing to use rest of cap space first.
     
    Mediocre Man, Jul 9, 2012
    #40
Page 2 of 4

Share This Page