Lawyer ordered to pay $4.5M to gay U-M student

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by SlyPokerDog, Aug 17, 2012.

  1. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,748
    Likes Received:
    146,000
    Trophy Points:
    115
    DETROIT (AP) — A jury on Thursday awarded a gay University of Michigan student body president $4.5 million in his lawsuit against a former Michigan assistant attorney general who posted about him in an anti-gay blog.

    The U.S. District Court jury ruled in favor of Christopher Armstrong, who claimed he suffered distress after a blog created by Andrew Shirvell accused him of enticing minors with alcohol and recruiting people to become homosexual.

    "I'm just incredibly humbled by what happened today," Armstrong told The Associated Press. "This is truly a victory — not just for myself, but for a lot of other kids out there."

    Shirvell, who was representing himself, said the jury award was "grossly excessive" for what was "clearly protected speech ... and activity."

    "This should have been thrown out," he said, adding that he plans to appeal. "Juries give short shrift to First Amendment rights."

    Armstrong accused Shirvell of defamation as well as emotional distress for his actions on the blog, in Facebook posts and during visits to the Ann Arbor campus.

    Then-Attorney General Mike Cox fired Shirvell in 2010 after he criticized Armstrong, who graduated last year.

    Shirvell has said he viewed his blog "as a movement to get" Armstrong to resign.

    Shirvell argued he was acting within his First Amendment rights and that his statements were either true or protected because of Armstrong's role as a public figure.

    Armstrong's attorney, Deborah Gordon, had said she would drop the lawsuit if Shirvell apologized and retracted his comments. Shirvell said that was disingenuous, since it wasn't until closing arguments that a multimillion-dollar award was brought up.

    Shirvell said he's unemployed and "there's no way I could possibly ever pay such a judgment."

    Gordon said the jury couldn't make him apologize, so the money was the only answer.

    "We needed him to retract the flat-out fabrications he had come up with about Chris," she said. "Once he refused to take responsibility, we put it in the hands of the jury."

    http://news.yahoo.com/lawyer-ordered-pay-4-5m-gay-u-m-222810693.html
     
  2. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,748
    Likes Received:
    146,000
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Jury got it right.
     
  3. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,060
    Likes Received:
    4,035
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    I hope Chris Armstrong uses most of that money for LGBT charities. It would look kind of bad if he didn't.
     
  4. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,748
    Likes Received:
    146,000
    Trophy Points:
    115
    What money?
     
  5. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    It's an interesting argument about protected speech. What he may have blogged was wrong (it sounds like, anyway), but I wonder how free speech enters into all this. As to the verdict, juries really don't look at "technicalities" when rendering verdicts. I've seen numerous cases go before juries where the statute of limitations had expired, but the jury simply overlooks it as they are loathe to let someone off on a technicality- even if it is the law. Seems like he may have grounds for appeal.

    As to the award, another guess, but I would think he'd hide his assets and then file for bankruptcy.
     
  6. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    An apology is the equivalent of $4.5m?

    That's just ridiculous.

    Ed O.
     
  7. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Defamation. The claims he lured minors with alcohol to entice them to become gay.

    He's free to say what he wants on his blog, but he was legitimately sued for what he wrote.
     
  8. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't think this is right.
     
  9. Sedatedfork

    Sedatedfork Rip City Rhapsody

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,981
    Likes Received:
    4,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle
    This makes me feel a lot better about the Blazers. They only paid Oden 5.17 apologies.
     
  10. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    That article sure soft-pedals the campaign that came out of the Attorney General's office to destroy the campus gay leader.

    The article keeps repeating the soft verb "criticize" to mean sinister dirty tricks. Shirvell did this to others, especially while he was a college student himself. After his campus informer days, he was hired by the right-wing Attorney General to fast track Shirvell's political potential.
     

Share This Page