Assuming Roy CAN play...

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Stevenson, Sep 14, 2012.

  1. Stevenson

    Stevenson Old School

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,168
    Likes Received:
    5,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Writer
    Location:
    PDX
    Why isn't he on our team again?

    If indeed his knees were very sore, and if it was a short season last year, wouldn't the creative answer have been to give him a year off and maybe renegotiate his contract to reflect that? It seems that the Blazers, as they so often do, jumped the gun, panicked, cut their ties and counted their cash savings.

    "Creative solutions they have not," said Yoda.

    I love Brandon and root for him even as a TWolf, but find it heartbreaking that he's not here if in fact he can play (and yes, that is a big IF, but it is Brandon friggin Roy we are talking about!)
     
  2. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    Doctors said he would never play again. If he continued it would literally cripple him in his 50 or 60s. Additionally, I don't think the league allows you to re-negotiate contracts.
     
  3. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,684
    Likes Received:
    13,089
    Trophy Points:
    113
    can't renegotiate his deal. He's not worth what his contract would be on our books currently. The opportunity to even try to get someone like Hibbert was worth having it off our books. Moving on with Lillard and Aldridge.
     
  4. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,780
    Likes Received:
    27,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Roy's Doctros told him he couldn't play anymore.


    Roy did not want to play here any longer. Just a guess of course (see avatar)
     
  5. ebott

    ebott Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    685
    Likes Received:
    165
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Mostly so we would have cap space to sign Roy Hibbert. If Brandon were still on the team we wouldn't have had that cap space and then we'd be straight up HOSED. Could you imagine how bad we'd be this year if we had to have Meyers Leonard or Joel Freeland starting at Center?
     
  6. Stevenson

    Stevenson Old School

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,168
    Likes Received:
    5,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Writer
    Location:
    PDX
    A team with Roy and Lilliard and LMA would be a very good team.

    You guys are drinking the koolaid. I say it happened like this: Roy came back, couldnt really play, and the team freaked out, urged him to retire (even though he obviously was not ready to) and amnistied him. They wanted to save their money, not win games, or work with their superstar. Do you think the Lakers would have forced Kobe to retire under similar circumstances. I think not.

    I call bullshit on the whole thing.

    They bungled it. They panicked.

    And how is that Hibbert cap space thing working out for you?
     
  7. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,205
    Likes Received:
    15,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I doubt anyone here drank the koolaid as most people on this board thought he should retire the year before. (I was not one of them)

    However what I did agree at the time was that he was no longer worth 16 million a year. 16 million a year by the way the Blazers had to pay regardless of him being amnestied.

    I think your reasoning is off, but I wish we had him for 5 million a year.
     
  8. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I think the problem with ths theory is the Blazers didn't need Roy to retire, they could have amnistied him injury or not.

    I believe it was Roy who announced to the Blazers' surprise that he was retiring (because he wanted to be able to run with his kids). If the Blazers were going to amnisty Roy, this turns out to be a blessing financially because insurance then pays Roy's salary. But then I think Blazers needed cap space so they ended up using the amnisty on Roy anyways.

    If Blazers intent was to amnisty Roy all along, they really didn't have to talk Roy into medically retiring.
     
  9. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    The same team with Wes instead of Roy is better.
     
  10. Rhal

    Rhal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    12,997
    Likes Received:
    2,756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    Portland
    I call BS on your whole speculation. EVERYONE was surprised when Roy came in and told them he was medically retiring. The Blazers doctors told him if he continued to play he wouldn't be able to run later in life, and he went to his own doctor who pretty much told him the same thing. His knees weren't doing better until he went over to Germany in the middle of the year and got the same treatment as Kobe, a treatment which isn't supposed to fix the knee but more numb it. Whatever you may think Roys knees are shot and he may get through this year but he wont be able to get through the next. When your meniscus is gone and your bone on bone there is no magic fix and with every step your causing more damage.
     
  11. Tince

    Tince Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    15,508
    Likes Received:
    15,076
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think its much more likely that Roy was ready to move on and used his knees to scare Portland into using their amnesty on him so he could go elsewhere and make more money. That scenario isn't very likely, but more probably than the one above in my opinion.

    I doubt in 3 years we'll be saying "I wish we were paying Roy $18m a year right now, that would be a great contract!"
     
  12. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,200
    Likes Received:
    30,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    I don't know how long Brandon will be able to play or how effective he will be in the time he does play. I do know that when Brandon announced his retirement, the Blazers weighed their options, which were essentially to wait a year and then apply for his money to come off of the books due to medical retirement or to take the one-time amnesty and get the cap relief immediately. Chad Buchanan was looking for a quick reload by adding a big-time free agent plus whatever he could get in the draft. He didn't get the job and Olshey decided he didn't want to go the aging veteran free agent route. I don't know if Chad's plan would have worked, but I do know that if Roy was still on the roster, Olshey wouldn't have had the cap space to sign guys like Freeland and Hickson. I think you just have to accept that both Buchanan and Olshey made the decisions that they thought were in the Blazers' best interests at the time and let it go. A year from now, if Lillard pans out the way we hope, Leonard is decent, and we get another good pick in next year's draft, the Blazers will be on the rise again and will be worth getting excited about. I think I can honestly say that I'd rather be looking at that eventuality than trying to milk a couple more years out of Brandon.
     
  13. SheedSoNasty

    SheedSoNasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    5,839
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Everyone in Portland wants to leave to play in Minnesota so its a moot point.
     
  14. GriLtCheeZ

    GriLtCheeZ "Well, I'm not lookin' for trouble."

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,488
    Likes Received:
    2,923
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Gleaming the Cubicle
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Why does everything have to be a conspiracy around here?
     
  15. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    No one has told you yet?
     
  16. mook

    mook The 2018-19 season was the best I've seen

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,309
    Likes Received:
    3,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Buy a recipe binder at CookbookPeople.com
    Location:
    Jolly Olde England
    I loved having Roy on the team, but I'm ready to turn the corner. He and Aldridge were never a great paring because Roy was a methodical half court player. Aldridge can clearly play that way, but he'll really excel in a more open court offense.

    If you put a bigger center on him he'll outrun him down the court. If you put a faster guy on him, he'll overpower him in the post. Grind-it-out half-court McMillan-ball eliminates this matchup nightmare that Aldridge can present.

    Lillard and Roy were ball dominant guards, and especially with his knee issues Roy was never going to be excited to play at a Lillard pace. Turning this corner was just something the franchise had to do. With Roy's history on the team, there simply weren't any half-measures you could take to turn that page, even if there weren't all the contract issues.
     
  17. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,989
    Likes Received:
    17,208
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    For as great as Roy is (was), he wasn't the player we really needed, one who makes everyone around him better.
     

Share This Page