You have made other (than 'dirty Mormon') comments. Like the magic underware comment. I don't get it with the left. They are tolerant of gays, minorities, illegal immigrants, people who terminate pregnacy, but they are intolerant of religion. (I know, it's not fair to throw all into the same kettle.) Go Blazers
I didn't see any joking about traditions here. Just calling out somebody as a "dirty Mormon". Yeah, that is closer to hate than making fun of traditions. Further, you're calling out an individual, not actually the traditions.
That's basically the definition of bigot and prejudice. Grouping all people of a certain label as the same as the ones causing the problems. Did you know that 40% of federal inmates are non-Hispanic blacks while they only account for 13% of the US population?
Romney should just change his name to "NotObama" because that's the only reason anybody's voting for him. He would need also to call himself "NotBush" if the world hadn't in fact started in January 2009.
There's dirty Catholics, dirty Liberals, dirty wannabe Stanford grads. I haven't made fun of the Mormon religion as a whole?
Because Mormon's and Jews have come remotely close to enduring the same type of things throughout their existence.... LOLZ!
That everyone at Stanford refuses to lose an argument? Or that it's always wrong to try to put people into boxes and categories, especially when it involves minorities?
I didn't say a word about hate. I will say that I agree that your intolerance is bigoted. (And, no I'm not Mormon.) Go Blazers
Apparently you're unaware of the Mormon extermination order from the governor Boggs of Missouri on October 27, 1838 that wasn't officially rescinded until 1976. Obviously the Holocaust trumps the extermination order, but I just thought you should know that it was actually legal to kill Mormons in Missouri for over 100 years.
Was that when everybody had 10 wives? I can see how that would draw some anger by the Missourans. Back in the 1800's.
Sarcastic or not, it's interesting that you're justifying the murder of a group of people because you disagree with their beliefs.
Am I justifying it? All I'm saying is that in the 1800's they probably didn't have much tolerance for strange religions coming in and having tons of wives. I'm not saying it was okay, just giving my opinion of why they could have perceived as they did.
