My Trailblazer, George Jefferson fool proof plan...version 1

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Mediocre Man, Nov 29, 2012.

  1. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,314
    Likes Received:
    26,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I love JJ Hickson and the energy he brings. However, you have to trade him at the deadline because he really doesn't fit with LaMacus. I feel a team needing some inside help and rebounding would give the Blazers a 1st for Hickson. For kicks and giggles, let's say it's the Hawks, for Petro and a 1st

    If things go as they should, Portland would end up with a mid lottery pick, say 6 and 24, along with 13 million or so to spend. Our roster would look like

    Lillard
    Matthews
    Batum
    Aldridge
    Leonard
    Freeland
    Claver
    Barton

    At this point, Portland needs A LOT, but it's still mostly complimentary bench players....no? They needs scoring, rebounding, perimeter and interior defense. IMO, those things can easily be addressed next summer. IMO, Andre Iguodala would be a good fit on our team, as would Tyreke Evans. However, with the lack of bigs in the draft it would be better to go with a player like Milsap. Milsap at 10mm. That would leave 3-4mm to sign a real back up PG like Aaron Brooks.

    Then draft some scoring in the draft like Archie Goodwin 6'4" height, 6'10" wingspan, who can score from anywhere on the floor with the lottery pick and add some quality stability with a seasoned player at 24 like Doug McDermott 6'8" SF who plays hard defense and can also score from anywhere. Then add a vet minimum center like Aldrich, Petro, Kwame

    Lillard/Brooks
    Matthews/Goodwin/Barton
    Batum/McDermott
    Aldridge/Milsap/Claver
    Leonard/Aldrich/Freeland
     
  2. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,462
    Likes Received:
    20,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    You know 'something'. :)
     
  3. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    123,026
    Likes Received:
    143,032
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Hickson will be very hard to trade at the deadline. He has to agree to the trade and if traded he will lose his bird rights.

    He will most likely be involved in a sign and trade at the end of the season.
     
  4. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As Sly notes, Hickson will be hard to trade ... but I do agree they should try. He's an energetic 4, who struggles defensively and doesn't fit particularly well with the personnel around him. This team isn't going anywhere with him or without him, so you might as well make moves that can hopefully add more balance to this roster.
     
  5. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,387
    Likes Received:
    12,524
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I keep wondering how difficult JJ will be to move. Yes, his bird rights for him are nice. But only if we intend to sign him, or S&T him. I also wonder if he'd be willing to accept a trade if it were either to a winning team, or somewhere he could get good minutes. Atlanta could be an option, and they'd have cap space to sign him next season. Maybe the Clippers? Hollins and odom are their only two bigs off the bench, each getting about 13 minutes a night, and each, really, playing like shit. Odom more so. Hickson taking their minutes with Crawford as well off the bench would be a bi boost to their title plans. And maybe JJ sees it as a chance to potentially win a ring, establish a role for himself. Who knows.
    I think OKC is a great fit for him, with Collison as their only real rotational big off the bench. They have a ton of pieces to move. Adding Hickson's energy to their team would be a big boost. Memphis?
     
  6. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Not a cap guru, but I like the idea of getting a big time player this summer with the salary cap room and then signing Hickson using his bird rights as the Blazers go over the cap.

    Hickson's age fits with the current Blazers, he would be energy off the bench and could take some minutes off of Aldridge's PT.

    So make a high ball offer to a center like Pek and then sign Hickson as a back up to Aldridge.
     
  7. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,387
    Likes Received:
    12,524
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hickson's cap hold would hurt our chance to make any sort of real sizable offer to a free agent.
     
  8. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,314
    Likes Received:
    26,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You'd just have to make sure to find a player that would sign without having to waive Hickson's Bird rights.
     
  9. WillG

    WillG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    813
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No way to trading Hickson - he's one of the only guys that brings it every night.

    I'd rather trade Aldridge for help at the 2 or 5 + picks.
     
  10. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    We should trade Aldridge and all other slow lardbutts who won't play as energetically as Hickson. We need to find 4 starters who fit with Hickson.
     
  11. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not opposed to trading Aldridge, but Hickson as a centerpiece ... well, that's just batshit.
     
  12. Hype #9

    Hype #9 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Are you saying we should trade our best player, who is also an All-star, because he doesnt fit with a player that was cut by a team last season? I hope you're being sarcastic.
     
  13. WillG

    WillG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    813
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I fully agree with jlprk, I think Hickson has a much better mindset, physical & energetic game than our so-called 'All-star'.

    Keep Hickson, trade Aldridge.
     
  14. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    62,965
    Likes Received:
    22,151
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    Good thread, MM. My thoughts:

    Aaron Brooks isn't good anymore.

    Hickson, with minutes as #1 option in the post, is good enough to become an All Star.
     
  15. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is LMA for Asik and Terrence Jones too little?
     
  16. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think that right now, Hickson is a better PF for this team that LaMarcus. We need a tough interior player. I'd rather keep JJ as our starting PF and see what we can get for LaMarcus.

    I'd try to trade LaMarcus for Noah or Hibbert.

    Or maybe LarMarcus to the Cavs for Varejeao /Pick
     
  17. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    I might let Batum, Lillard, and Matthews stay if they bow down to Hickson whenever he rebounds their missed shots. Imagine if we didn't have him bailing out everyone's errors. We'd be the 0-12 team, not the Bullets. Now that we have a real savior PF, we need to trade Aldridge before the secret of his worthless icebergness melts out. But let's take our time and get a giant established star, because we can have almost anyone we want, he's such a big name.
     
  18. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,314
    Likes Received:
    26,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think it is, but if they added another young player or a decent first it would be pretty good
     
  19. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,314
    Likes Received:
    26,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well apparently this isn't fool proof since a bunch of you fools found flaws in it :D

    I will try again
     
  20. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,976
    Likes Received:
    4,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    oh yeah - what team is Brooks playin for? oh yeah it's Sac, the same who let Hickson go for NOTHING.
     

Share This Page