Re-Sign Hickson to a long-term contract?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Hobbesarable, Nov 29, 2012.

?

Should the Blazers Re-Sign Hickson?

  1. Yes

    11 vote(s)
    73.3%
  2. No

    4 vote(s)
    26.7%
  1. Hobbesarable

    Hobbesarable Cartoon Character

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    6,773
    Likes Received:
    5,490
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you're looking from the perspective of the action (or perpetrator in this case). Try looking at it from the victim's perspective.

    :MARIS61:
     
  2. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Personally, I think he keeps playing in mini-Beast Mode until the trade deadline. I think the fact that all we can offer is 3/13.8M means he's not signing an extension with us, so when July 1 rolls around we either have a 7.6M cap hit on our books to retain his Bird rights, or we just cut him loose for absolutely nothing. That cap hit (assuming nothing else happens) means we'll have anywhere between about 3M and 6M left over, which doesn't get you a whole lot of "needle-moving" free agents.

    But he has veto status b/c of his Bird Rights, right? Well, yeah...but Bird Rights aren't what they used to be.

    JJ, no matter how great he plays, won't get a max deal. He's only 24, so it's not like taking a 4-year deal instead of a 5-year is going to cripple his career earning potential. At his level, the difference b/w 4.5% raises and 7.5% raises comes out to about 250k a year, or 1M over the course of a 4-year contract. I think that when trade deadline rolls around, we get his permission to trade him to a team that could use a bouncy big man for the playoffs in exchange for a couple of juicy assets (Euro rights, far-out draft picks, etc). If we end up with about 15M in cap space (if the cap goes up a couple of million) then I wouldn't be shocked if PLan B was to get a couple of guys like Hickson and Redick or Morrow or something to fill out a playoff-caliber rotation.
     
  3. Hobbesarable

    Hobbesarable Cartoon Character

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    6,773
    Likes Received:
    5,490
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Makes sense. Thank you for providing your well informed opinion.
     
  4. WillG

    WillG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    813
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trade Aldridge, sign Hickson, fill in SG, C & bench with the assets.
     
  5. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A fool and his money ...
     
  6. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    We should have traded Aldridge for Dwight Howard.

    For those who are about to vote and have read Brian's explanation, the question becomes, "Pretending you haven't read that yet, should we re-sign Hickson?"
     

Share This Page