[Post Game] A clear tank job is in full swing

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Fez Hammersticks, Nov 28, 2012.

  1. KeepOnRollin

    KeepOnRollin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    11,498
    Likes Received:
    5,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    North Idaho
    Easy to see we are done here. Excuses don't make you sick. Being in fact sick makes you sick. Take care RoyToy.
     
  2. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    Being sick might pull down your performance 20% one game, 10% the next, 5% the next and it's over. His performance has been down 80% for a number of games now, so illness is just an excuse.

    The reason is that the offense emphasizes Aldridge over him, so it takes extraordinary energy for him to break a play and attack the basket. But Aldridge is good for only one thing, so Stotts has Aldridge shoot.
     
  3. KeepOnRollin

    KeepOnRollin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    11,498
    Likes Received:
    5,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    North Idaho
    80% sure seems like a number pulled directly from you know where.

    Here is his game log this season:
    http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/batumni01/gamelog/2013/

    He has 3 games all year under double-digit points. That is actually pretty good. Blue9 had a nice thread months ago on the OregonLive forum where he showed that Batum is actually one of the more consistent SF's in the league outside of the big 3 in the league (LeBron, Durant if you want to classify him as SF, and Carmelo). People say he hasn't changed and that is true because for the last few years he has already been consistent.

    If blue9 happens to see this I hope he will repost the thread.
     
  4. Hobbesarable

    Hobbesarable Cartoon Character

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    6,773
    Likes Received:
    5,490
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You may want to try him between 8 am and 5 pm. He said he responds more during work time.

    Btw, it's nice seeing you here, Rollin.
     
  5. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    I decided he didn't dip enough to argue over it. His efficiency points per minute dropped from great (60+) to good (40-49) to mediocre (25-39) in the 3 games before the Wizards loss (Minnesota, Brooklyn, Detroit). He never dropped to awful, just mediocre, so I will cease and desist since he showed signs of revival in the Wizards game.

    Minutes...eff...efficiency points per minute
    44.6 18 .40 Washington
    37.8 11 .29 Detroit
    37.8 12 .32 Brooklyn
    36.1 09 .25 Minnesota
    32.6 15 .46
    38.3 16 .42
    46.6 37 .79
    33.3 21 .63
    40.2 15 .37
    39.1 37 .95
    40.3 23 .57
    35.8 16 .45
    44.7 29 .65
    36.7 -4 -.11
    40.4 27 .67

    To get the per minute stat, the above spreadsheet was sourced from

    http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketbal...yers/nicolas-batum/gamelog/13/25/355/1-1-date
     
  6. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To make sure I have this right, EFF is generally the same range as points, right? 10-15= average night and 35 = great night? So assuming a starter plays 35-40 minutes a night, you're looking at an average night being ~ .3-.4, and a great night being about 1? Is efficiency a cumulative stat like WAR or is it like PER?
     
  7. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    Efficiency just adds a player's box score line into one number. Everywhere except ESPN it's defined as

    Points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks - turnovers - missed FG - missed FT

    I used it so I wouldn't have to indidually compare Batum's games by rebounds, then by points, then by assists, etc. You can do it for one game or cumulatively for many.

    Hoopsstats is the best site for efficiency stats examined from every angle, except per minute, so I had to feed its per game eff into a simple little spreadsheet to convert to per minute. The result would be a little close to each player's points if you multiply the eff/min by 48 to get eff/48 min. But I didn't. I just used eff per minute.
     

Share This Page