20 dead kids is a tragedy and a mass killing. It was not done with weapons of mass destruction. And no, 20 dead kids is not a compelling interest. It may be a social interest or your personal pet interest. It's not a STATE interest, nor is it compelling. A cannon isn't a weapon of mass destruction either. If you want to understand what a WMD is, read the FAQ on the FBI site: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/terrorism/wmd/wmd_faqs And if you want to understand what "compelling state interest" means: http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/compelling-state-interest-test/
Just wow. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2012/07/17/toronto-shooting-victims.html (On July 17, 25 people were shot and 2 killed at a block party in TORONTO. Toronto is in Canada.)
as a percentage of total gun shootings, probably pretty similar....somewhere close to being statistically insignificant and/or near zero.
Yes they are. And like every other stat you've posted in this thread, mentioning them is unrelated and 100% pointless.
Are you seriously using a single example and acting like it shows something? Are you seriously trying to claim that Canada doesn't have a MINISCULE gun-death per capita rate compared with the US? Actually, you're not serious, are you? You've been trolling all along. It's the only answer.
http://www.juancole.com/2012/07/300000-violent-gun-crimes-a-year-in-the-us-poster.html UK is actually considered one the most violent countries in Europe. They banned the right to carry firearms too.
EDIT: fucked up the stat... my bad. Let's try again. Intentional Homicide rate per 100,000: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate UK - 1.2 per 100K US - 4.2 per 100K
i guess at the end of the day, im more concerned with murder than guns for instance russia has a much higher murder rate, and a much smaller percentage are gun related oregon has a similar murder rate to canada, what is oregon doing right that the rest of the country can emulate?
Canada has about 1/2 the per capita gun death rate we do. It's not "minuscule compared to ours," by any rational definition. You point to Canada as if it's some panacea. It's not.
The intentional homicide rate was what I was really after, and I put it in my post above. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate