Radio Carbon Dating is only accurate for a few thousand years. Anything after that, it is extremely inaccurate. Look at the post I just gave Maris BTW... I didn't say you were wrong. I said Oden was right about radiocarbon dating not being used for geology dating.
2,000-4,000 years? http://www.macmillandictionary.com/thesaurus/british/few If you want exact dates, then all of science past 4,000 is extremely inaccurate.
If he is going to argue that he knows more about radiocarbon decay facts; his basis being wrong about what occurs is a BIG red flag. "I know more than you about your wife Sarah!" "Her name isn't Sarah." "Oh ... well I still know her better than you!" That's kind of what his argument sounds like to me.
Comically hypocritical to see people who base their belief in mythical magical beings solely on "faith" nitpicking over how accurate carbon dating is.
Why? Faith isn't requiring accuracy, but science does. So when someone using science, tosses speculation; then it should be noted that its speculation. I doubt any Christian would deny there is some magic wand thing happening in creation. But debating an atheistic approach; we don't want to go down a slippery slope now do we?
Hey sorry I start Spring term this week so I've been pretty busy so I can't really dedicate hours to debating here right now. When I get some more time i'll be happy to dialogue with you guys
