I would agree with you, Mags. It isn't Christian. So you can recognize that just because a Christian does something wrong (turn away a gay sheep), it doesn't necessarily indict all of Christianity, and it doesn't mean the bad behavior was caused by Christianity, right?
This is true, plenty of a-holes to go around. But you go farther. It's a fallacious form of reasoning and you only do yourself a disservice by misrepresenting any position. In a debate, I would think that would be on par with conceding. It's quite hilarious. You actually imagine you know the motivation behind each and every death under Mao (wrong) moreover, that each death was necessitated by atheism (wrong) and that you know this because atheism is required for communism (wrong)? Is that about it? Do you tend to go in for conspiracy theories too? Would that be a fair assessment?
