I dunno: it might be a combination. I get the impression that a lot of Gordon's problems are from the fact that he never wanted to be traded to New Orleans. If he gets unloaded it'll be because they actively dislike him, not because they're giving up on him for being oft-injured.
Here is an article before this year's trade deadline. (He just had another arthroscopic surgery on his ankle yetserday, although minor in nature the trend is alarming for a 24 year old max player) http://www.bourbonstreetshots.com/2013/02/18/an-outline-of-eric-gordons-injury-history/ 2008-09 Season (78 out of 82 games) February 2009 (4 games) – Bruised left shoulder 2009-10 Season (62 out of 82 games) November 2009 (8 games) – Strained groin December 2009 (1 game) – Precautionary (hamstring tightness) January 2010 (3 games) – Sprained left big toe March 2010 (5 games) – Groin injury April 2010 (3 games) – Viral infection (final 3 games of the season; Clippers tanking?) 2010-11 Season (56 out of 82 games) November 2010 (2 games) – Bruised left shoulder January 2011 (18 games) – Right wrist bone chip fracture (which he played through for 17 minutes after first suffering the injury) March 2011(6 games) – Re-injury to right wrist 2011-12 Season (9 out of 66 games) December 2011 (57 games) – Right knee injury 2012-13 Season (18 out of 53 games) October 2012 (29 games) – Right knee injury January 2013 (5 games) – Rest (back-to-back games) February 2013 (1 game) – Sprained right hand (precautionary due to prior wrist injury) So to break things down, he has missed games because of: Hamstring tightness (1) Sprained left big toe (2) Left shoulder bruise (6) Precautionary/rest/sickness (10) Strained groin (13) Right wrist/hand injury (24) Right knee injury (86) The goal of this outline is not to push fans in one way or the other in regards to their opinions regarding Eric Gordon’s future in New Orleans, but merely to make them aware of what has ailed Gordon throughout his 4 1/2 year NBA career. While it could certainly be argued that the first three listed injuries indicate some fragility, the only three injuries that stand out to me as cause for concern are the bottom three – his groin, right wrist, and right knee. It is pretty clear that the Hornets feel the same way, evidenced by Gordon’s late scratch from the lineup on Wednesday night. The team held him out with an injured hand despite his desire to play simply because it was near his previous right wrist injury. Personally, I am not against trading Gordon, but I am against doing so before Thursday’s trade deadline, and I think the Hornets share this stance. As Rohan Cruyff from At the Hive mentioned on Friday, barring another major injury, I fail to see how Gordon’s trade value could sink much lower than it stands right now. Given the data above, I think that the approach of assuming he will sustain another devastating injury over the next 29 games is an overly paranoid one. By not playing Gordon in the second game of back-to-backs as well as holding him out of games purely as a precaution, the Hornets are clearly taking the most conservative approach that they can in order to ensure his long-term health. If team management decides that it would prefer to deal Eric Gordon, that is fine, but unless some unexpectedly great offer presents itself in the next 72 hours, I believe that waiting until the summer (at the earliest) is the team’s best option.
Gordon would be a huge mistake. He's way too injury prone. He's definitely a talent, but we need someone we can count on for most the season.
Career PER of 15.8 Career USG of 23.9, with it being 29+ the last two seasons He's an inefficient scorer who doesn't defend, and is on a terrible contract. I'd rather keep Barton as the back-up SG.
I've always been a Gordon doubter because he's a very short SG, and those are normally terrible. But his effect on New Orleans when he plays is pretty amazing. They're useless without him but very competitive with him. I wouldn't give up any rotation players to get him, but if New Orleans just wants to unload his contract, then I say go for it. That's how Golden State got Baron Davis, and Memphis got Zach Randolph.
I we trade lma for potential; I'm gonna be pissed. It's one thing if we can find a superstar, but I'm done with potential right now. I wanna win
Nope. Our defensive presence starts with a good center. There are some good defensive teams, but the great defensive teams usually have that anchor on defense. Kinda like Indiana and Chicago.
It helps but what center does Miami have? Who does SA have when Duncan is on the bench? They still play tough D without him.
Miami is an exception. San Antonio has a center. His name is Duncan. Take Duncan out and I bet they wouldn't be as good as there are.
Yeah but like I said they are a good defensive team without him. Centers are important, but it doesn't start with one, it starts with a solid defensive system and the coaches who implement it.
