Who would you trade first?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by magnifier661, Jun 24, 2013.

?

Which player traded will give you the best outcome for next season?

  1. Aldridge

    4 vote(s)
    22.2%
  2. Batum

    3 vote(s)
    16.7%
  3. Matthews

    6 vote(s)
    33.3%
  4. Combo of the younger, rookie scale contracts.

    5 vote(s)
    27.8%
  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    So out of all the players available; which one do you think would give us the best possible shot to win next season? (keeping the rest of the core)
     
  2. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    No what players on our roster, that will net us a player that moves the needle.
     
  4. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,848
    Likes Received:
    26,177
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    The question is kind of empty: it all depends on whom you can get.
     
  5. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Well it's pretty obvious that Aldridge would net the highest return value. I would guess Batum is next valuable. So the real question is would you use Batum to get a different player in the obtainable field.
     
  6. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    29,150
    Likes Received:
    9,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    LMA

    He easily has the most value.

    A UFA in 14-15 I think Neil would be smart to see what he can get for him now.
     
  7. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None of the above.

    However if you stretch your 1 year out to 2 years, I say Batum.

    Batum has a big contract, and if you could get say a top 5 pick for him this year along with a rotation player, then deal Aldridge at the deadline or next year for a ransom, you could turn around the franchise in a heartbeat with the assets and large cap room next summer. As well as great draft class next summer we would be drafting high in.

    Aldridge would net us the most assets in return though
     
  8. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    You are absolutely correct. He has the most value, but would what we get in return bring success next season, knowing that we lose him?
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Who would?
     
  10. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    29,150
    Likes Received:
    9,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    Long-term pieces to fit next to the (new) franchise player -- Damian Lillard.

    Alex Len
    The uber deep 2014 draft.
     
  11. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,047
    Likes Received:
    4,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    what's the overall goal? to make the playoffs next year or build a "real" contender? the contender route might mean sucking and take 2-3 years. Some would argue we can build a contender now with the assets we have - I say that's possible but not probable unless we are both lucky and Neil is very, very good.
     
  12. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who would what?
     
  13. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Shit I misread. I thought you said Aldridge wouldn't net us the greatest return. My mistake.
     
  14. BoBoBREWSKI

    BoBoBREWSKI BURP!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    14,339
    Likes Received:
    5,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW
    Matthews is a good role player with a good contract. It doesnt make sense to trade him IMO.
     
  15. Reep

    Reep Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,545
    Likes Received:
    3,569
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    South Jordan, UT
    +1. There is no player on the roster I wouldn't trade under the right circumstances. Lillard would probably be the hardest to let go of.

    Aldridge: has the most value, is the oldest, and is the most likely to leave the soonest.
    Batum: question marks about his ability to play consistently at a high level
    Matthews: great character, reasonable contract, good D--a very solid role player

    Aldridge would have to return several shots on goal who are younger (rebuild)
    Batum would have to produce a big who would look very good next to Aldridge, or a decent big and another wing
    Matthews would probably need to produce an average big or a younger, riskier SG.
     
  16. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,643
    Likes Received:
    20,336
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    If the goal is to be better next year, trade the scrubs for someone who can actually contribute. If the goal is to be better in three years, then trade Aldridge and hang onto cap space until next summer.
     
  17. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree with this assessment. Though for Wes I'd want both an average big and a younger/riskier SG.
    I also don't see any available bigs that would warrant a Nic trade.
     
  18. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If it were that easy I'd be more willing to keep LMA.
     
  19. Reep

    Reep Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,545
    Likes Received:
    3,569
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    South Jordan, UT
    I agree there are no Nic for C trades that pop out at this time. I don't even know if this would be possible, but what about Nic for sign and trade Pek? Nic plus value for Horford if Atlanta can't get an FA and wants to rebuild?
     
  20. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Personally, I hate it.
    Not too keen on the Horford one either.
     

Share This Page