Aldridge at center revisited

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by magnifier661, Jul 3, 2013.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I personally believe Aldridge can be a good rim protector if called to do so. I'm curious if we brought in a millsap; then have Aldridge play center would be a good thing.

    I know it's not the best case scenario; but millsap is a very good defender; plus is amazing at scoring off the block. The combo of those two may be a good idea.

    A sign and trade of Matthews and freeland could do it, since Utah will probably lose him anyway.
     
  2. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,733
    Likes Received:
    13,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's pushing him out the door even faster. Might as well just trade him.
     
  3. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,099
    Likes Received:
    4,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    I don't mind him at C if the PF is defense minded, can rebound and help on rotations and close off the rim a bit. I don't think Millsap is the guy for that. Very good defender? I don't think I would say that. Someone like Josh Smith I think would actually pair well with Aldridge. But overall, one of the main reasons to keep LMA at PF instead of C is because we want to keep LMA, and putting him at a position he doesn't want to play is a good way to encourage his departure.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2013
  4. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I think the effort with carrying the team offensively is harder on him. If we were able to bring in another "low block" scorer; there is a ton of offensive pressure we can take off of Aldridge.
     
  5. HomerLovesKoolAid

    HomerLovesKoolAid I have a well-known member.

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,352
    Likes Received:
    7,513
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He COULD be a good rim protector if he wanted to be. He just doesn't seem to have too much interest in reacting or helping on defense.
     
  6. Charcoal Filtered

    Charcoal Filtered Writing Team

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,753
    Likes Received:
    2,431
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If Aldridge was willing to play center, do you think Stotts might have tried that last year and had Hickson play PF?
     
  7. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Actually I saw him playing center a lot last season. There was a lot of stretch 4 offense. Remember Babbitt coming in as a PF?
     
  8. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,788
    Likes Received:
    27,548
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just tell Aldridge that Robinson is the center, but he will guard the opposing center on defense.

    Not sure it matters cause he will be traded next week anyway
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Or just get dalembert and have Aldridge play center in the fourth and use Claver as a stretch 4?
     
  10. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Quick twitch reactions are usually more about innate genetic characteristics than "wanting" them. His position defense and rotations are actually pretty good, it's when he's asked to quickly jump up and contest shots and leap for rebounds that you see that he's kind of limited as an NBA defensive anchor.
     
  11. Charcoal Filtered

    Charcoal Filtered Writing Team

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,753
    Likes Received:
    2,431
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Short stretches. He wants to play next to a dominate center, not be one.
     
  12. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,230
    Likes Received:
    15,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They already use LMA at center in the 4th. And i am sure they will continue to do this. I don't think LMA has a problem doing it in small doses. He just can't guard a center all game long and play big minutes.
     
  13. HomerLovesKoolAid

    HomerLovesKoolAid I have a well-known member.

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,352
    Likes Received:
    7,513
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't buy that. He should have better anticipation on defense regardless of his genetic makeup. He is often caught standing, watching the play and I would never agree that his defensive rotations are pretty good. I would agree that his individual position defense on the block is good.
     
  14. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,663
    Likes Received:
    20,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    I don't see any way we are going to get a better center than Aldridge, unless we trade Aldridge. What he said at the end of the season was the team needs a big post player who can come in and bang when needed. He even said it doesn't have to be full time, just come in and do some heavy lifting when needed. Regardless, like Mediocre Man, I think the odds are he is traded.
     
  15. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Mags, Aldridge is gone. It sucks, but there's little if anything we could do to change his mind.
     
  16. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are definitely times when LaMarcus coasts on defense, but part of that is because as a go-to scorer he has had to be careful about picking up ticky-tack fouls and getting sent to the bench for long stretches. When he does play defense, his weak-side rotations are good, he usually stays in front of his man and his court awareness seem good, but he just doesn't react all that quickly when it comes to shot-blocking or getting position for rebounds.

    I know it's somehow more comforting to think that players' failings are spiritual or mental -- probably because those things can be "fixed" through hard work or "wanting it more" -- but when the failings are because of physical limitations or athletic limitations, there usually isn't a remedy for that and you're sort of "stuck" with it.
     
  17. HomerLovesKoolAid

    HomerLovesKoolAid I have a well-known member.

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,352
    Likes Received:
    7,513
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think LMA could dominate the game on both ends and is not limited physically or athletically. His personality might be the limiting factor. He is a very nice guy it seems, maybe too nice, and if he was more of a dick (see Garnett) he might get after it more on defense and the glass.
     
  18. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If that's how you feel then you should be clamoring for LMA to be traded, because guys that don't want to dominate can never be relied upon to carry your team to a title. That's the defining characteristic that separates the merely good from the great.
     
  19. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,230
    Likes Received:
    15,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When? This summer? I would be surprised. I am not totally against it if we got young quality talent in return, but I think the odds are against it.

    I understand the theory that the longer you wait the less you get for him, and I see the validity to that with cities who have no chance in keeping him. (Detroit/Milwaukee)

    But I also think Neil will keep him for a year to see if things change. At that point I am sure you can get a lottery pick for him next year along with cap space. If you trade him now before the season starts, he will make a big enough difference to where that pick is not as good.

    Players are emotional after a season ends. Things change quickly on how happy they are. Just keep Quick away from his ass.
     
  20. HomerLovesKoolAid

    HomerLovesKoolAid I have a well-known member.

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,352
    Likes Received:
    7,513
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True, and since my many inner voices tell me he won't re-up here, I won't be surprised or upset when he is traded for some (hopefully) high value players.
     

Share This Page