I recently saw this blog on ESPN about the rankings of the AFC South QBs (1st string and 2nd string together). ESPN's AFC South blogger Paul Kuharsky asked ESPN's resident scout Matt Williamson on the rankings of each team's QB combo in the AFC South. Williamson's ranking is: 1) Colts (Andrew Luck, Matt Hasselbeck), 2) Texans (Matt Schaub, T.J. Yates), 3) Titans (Jake Locker, Ryan Fitzpatrick), 4) Jaguars (Blaine Gabbert, Chad Henne). I was pretty surprised that Williamson and Kuharsky ranked Colts QB combo ahead of Texans QB combo. As a Colts fan I have seen my fair share of undervaluing the team's roster. What was more shocking was that Kuharsky stated that Colts QB Andrew Luck is better than Texans QB Matt Schaub and the gap between them is big. His reason for that statement is he believes that Schaub is not a franchise QB but rather a good system QB that depends on a good run game (Arian Foster) and a great defense (JJ Watt, Brian Cushing, etc.). Williamson believes that the gap is not that large and Schaub is classified as a solid QB. There are also more questions that Kuharsky asks Williamson in the following link: http://espn.go.com/blog/afcsouth/post/_/id/51224/unit-by-unit-ranking-the-afc-south-quarterbacks My question for all you Colts fans is that do you agree with the ranking of Williamson and Kuharsky? If not, then reply to this thread and post your own ranking. Also do you think that the gap between Andrew Luck and Matt Schaub is small or large?
