Would you accept Batum for Monroe?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by magnifier661, Jul 23, 2013.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I think Detroit would bite because Josh Smith is best at PF. There aren't enough minutes to distribute between Drummond, Monroe and Smith. I think they would agree to deal us Monroe and Villanueva for Batum.

    Would any of you guys be for that?
     
  2. santeesioux

    santeesioux Just keep on scrolling by

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    10,738
    Likes Received:
    5,311
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Trolling the internet
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    Of course, then you could trade LMA for a really good SF.
     
  3. cdub503

    cdub503 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,845
    Likes Received:
    390
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Then what at sf? I'd rather not. I'd rather develop what we got rather than make another hole for us.
     
  4. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Or keep them and see how it goes. We would have 5 very strong bigs at our disposal (Aldridge, Monroe, Lopez, T. Rob and Leonard). Have stotts work with them and find the best combo to start and best bench. Then whomever is left over, just trade for other needs.
     
  5. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I think a hole at SF is easier to fill than center and PF. Wright isn't half bad either and Claver can be a back-up.
     
  6. santeesioux

    santeesioux Just keep on scrolling by

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    10,738
    Likes Received:
    5,311
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Trolling the internet
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    But who could start at sf then? You could put LMA there on offense, but what about defense?
     
  7. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Wright could start at SF

    I think Monroe and T. Rob would work great together; while Aldridge and Lopez would be awesome too
     
  8. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL in like 2 seconds

    16/10/4 19.5 PER

    vs

    14/6/5 15.7 PER

    One is a 6' 11" and one is 6' 8"
     
  9. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,479
    Likes Received:
    27,329
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You would only do this move if you had designs on moving Lamarcus. Monroe is a starter and wants to remain one. He and Lamarcus would not work together. They play the same position. It's a move I would consider though only if we could get a significant SF back for LA. And where is that guy? I think we already have him in Batum.
     
  10. KeepOnRollin

    KeepOnRollin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    11,497
    Likes Received:
    5,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    North Idaho
    Paul George. Not that I sure they would do it (they don't really need a PF) but seems equal compensation for LMA.
     
  11. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Greg Monroe led the league in shots per game at the rim. He and LaMarcus would be just fine
     
  12. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,479
    Likes Received:
    27,329
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Um who's gonna play D? There are 2 sides of the ball remember? Our Post D as well as rim protection would continue to suck and we will have gotten Lopez for nothing.
     
  13. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,479
    Likes Received:
    27,329
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Plus where are all the minutes for:

    Aldridge/Robinson/Freeland
    Monroe/Lopez/Leonard

    Somebody's got to go. We should only go after Monroe (with Batum) if Aldridge is on his way out too.
     
  14. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,741
    Likes Received:
    55,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Leonard and Freeland are not of concern if you are able to acquire Monroe while keeping Aldridge. Lopez becomes the first big off the bench and Robinson mops up with any available minutes. Monroe becomes insurance in case Aldridge wants out.

    Not saying I think Detroit goes for this, but if it DID happen, I think you keep developing Leonard and Robinson while Monroe and Aldridge start, and Lopez is primary backup off the bench.
     
  15. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm with MM. IMO, this would be a no brainer, which is also why I doubt Detroit would do it.

    I would love to see Monroe and Aldridge playing together, because of Monroe's passing ability. As far as defense is concerned, absent a decent scheme, the personnel will be irrelevant.

    As for the hole at SF, I would think that in this scenario, we would probably be able to then deal Robinson and Leonard (who would no longer have minutes for development) for a decent SF.
     
  16. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Aldridge is a very above average defender. I don't understand your issue?
     
  17. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure I'd trade Nicolas for Monroe. People want to complain about Monroe's defense, but the dirty little secret is that Nic is no great shakes on D anyway, so I'm not sure you're losing much.
     
  18. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    96 minutes between the two spots

    If Aldridge and Monroe get 70 of them, then Lopez gets 26 and Freeland and leonar_ get what they deserve
     
  19. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nic is a poor defender. Some fans, for some reason, don't want to see it
     
  20. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, Batum and LaMarcus have been with the team the longest. We should be rotating new players onto the team every few years.
     

Share This Page