Would you accept Batum for Monroe?

Nic for Drummond - yes. Nic for Monroe - no.
LMA for Monroe + ...yes.

 

Nolan was here longer than Damian. we got rid of the wrong PG

 

I don't think you understand what "defense" means...

 

That must be it

 

I think Monroe and T. Rob would be a good combo. And hopefully Monroe could develop a defensive game. If not; then you have either Monroe, Lopez or Aldridge to use as a trade chip before the deadline.

 

Exactly!

 

LMA + Monroe is much better than Batum + Monroe.

 

In his scenario it is LMA plus Drummond or Batum plus Monroe Mags. Keep up

P.S. Not saying it is realistic.

 

Green font? "Poor defenders" cannot do this:

[video=youtube;qHeLM-PgGyk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHeLM-PgGyk[/video]

 

I would love that but it's a pipe dream.

 

I know exactly what he's saying, but I ignored the possibility of Drummond. SO the realistic scenario is Batum + Monroe or Aldridge + Monroe.

 

Anyone can pull out highlights.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7_TreZC5[video=youtube;ts7_TreZC5M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7_TreZC5M[/video]

 

Everyone wants Paul George. (Lakers would kill for him) We might as well stop mentioning him as an option. It's just not going to happen.

 

Yep, poor defenders never block shots. Also, playing defense doesn't mean blocked shots

 

Agreed. Aldridge is a liability on defense IMHO. He is a lazy defender. He makes me want to say "Swiper stop swiping!" (a la Dora the Explorer)
when he lazily fouls someone instead of attempting a block.

 

Yet top 5 in FG% against in the paint

 

Wat? Your avatar is telling the truth me thinks.

 

as blue9 would say

 

People overlook that. It's only blocking shots and they don't give a shit about man on man D.

 

I keep telling people, and most already know that I know nothing about anything, including the game of basketball. It's silly of you to even lower yourself to argue with me