it means he's thinking about your balls professional athletes hooking up on the road and not necessarily being great people hardly started with Blazer players in the 90s. Anyone remember Wilt? How about Babe Ruth? Hell, Arnold Palmer. I wasn't under illusion that the 1977 championship Blazers were perfect people. Thankfully Blazer fans had actual reporters doing their jobs covering the team's games back in that day and not alienating players year after year STOMP
We had the same thing in the Navy. More than half of the married guys were banging anything that moved when we hit a port. I think only one person was stupid enough to say anything to a wife and she did not believe it. I did not agree with it, but felt it was none of my business too.
Okay, so now let's look at the rosters of those teams. Which "particularly troublesome player" couldn't we unload? I can't get my mind to go back further than Raymond Felton, lol...
Yet here you are, reading my next post, unwilling to admit how impressed you are by the sheer awesomeness of me.
First it had to be Roy. U can tell quick felt close to him when he was a rook and money changed him. Second for all the quick haters he is loved around the league by other beat reporters and national writers. Therefore I'm going with their opinions over posters on message boards. Third (hcp) I mean would u bet anything meaningful that majority of nba players don't cheat?? U come off trying to be a bad ass "poster" but won't admit these guys are dogs. I think it's funny how u all say I know nothing yet bash quick even though his peers respect him a lot. Fucking hypocrites.
Yes because the media never sticks up for one one another.......Fuck give me a break. These guys always have each other's backs. How often do you hear them bashing one another? That argument is absurd. Even in comparison to all your other absurd comments.
I really don't get what you're trying to accomplish here. At the beggining of this thread I posted that I liked Quick and will miss his coverage of the Blazers. Simple and succinct. I've read lots of posts that take a different view of Quick. Some makes some pretty valid points. That doesn't mean that I'm wrong or they're wrong. It's just different opinions. You come in here with some strange chest thumping "I'm right, everyone else is wrong!" weak ass attitude. You seem not to want to discuss but instead argue and inflame. Why?
Why are you even responding to Mixum? The dude should be banned along with his other account, but we allow him to stay. I just ignore him.
A fallacy, a fallacy, I think I see a fallacy.... What does this have to do with anything anyone has said here?
