PapaG was banned tonight

Extremely

 

"Splayed," lol. I love typos!

 

That post had poor grammar.

 

i found that funny.
LOL

 

Please do not edit this, this is the email that I sent him after being called many names including racist, bigot, and lying about what I discussed in a thread about family.

Subject line:
I really do find you to be a horrible person

Body of PM:
Personality and character completely devoid of beauty. A miserable person.




Then there was one more email where I was responding to him telling me to fuck off where I just responded "Got it" and that was 100% of the PM's I sent him.

 

hmm this is a tough room to have opinions that differ from the progressive majority. I for one will miss PapaG. Not that I agreed with his demands to be banned and so forth, but rather I respected his strength to make a stand on what he believes regardless of popular opinion. When called out he had the ability to adjust his position if he believed he had been proven wrong. All in all a deeper thinker than many.

Bow down? Hardly. I would not think you should be so proud, as you instigated a lot of the negative attention you have received. To be sure to not cross any line in the future, by intention or other, I am through with you all together.

 

I'll splay you wookee!!

wait a minute, what does that mean? Maybe I won't. I don't even want to touch a wookee.

and to quote a beloved poster
"neener"

 

How did Paul Pierce get involved in this discussion?

 

FIFY

 

Bullshit.

 

wait, so was PapaG banned?

 

There is an ignore feature, feel free to use it on me. I however will continue to read your posts, I quite enjoy them even if I don't agree. I do hope you rethink your stance of being done with me, but I understand if you don't.

One of the maddening things about the OT forum is also one of the reasons I (and I assume you too) read the OT threads, it has extremely diverse opinions. People get testy with me, and I get testy with others, that's par for the course when two ends of the spectrum hash it out. But there is a big difference between making minor comments or dissecting ones words, and attacking the person with lies and insults.

Also, even after the lies and attacks, papag was simply asked to stop and the attacks were edited. Then he went on a rampage, starting another thread about it. Still, just asked to stop. Then he started attacking Sly, and still sly just edited but did not ban. It was Nate who came in, saw one of his mods being attacked by a multi-repeat offender, and finally said enough is enough. I never asked for the ban, sly never asked for the ban, the ban had nothing to do with his stances, the ban was brought on by papag, knowing full well that he was way over the line.

 

QT Julius

' to call papag a deeper thinker than many of the people here, is laughable at best, and insulting at worst. "

fair enough, I suppose I should have said several instead. Please do not make me point out SPD.

"He doesn't ever waver from his stance (unless it's a stance that's even more conservative than his own). He makes things personal."

I believe the same could be said for many here

"As for the bow down thing, obviously further was joking. And the negative attention that was garnered from this was 75% papag, and 25% further. Go back and read the threads again, but this time ignore the name of the person who said it."

You see it a joking, I see it as gloating. Easily proven by his continued actions. Also bolsters my first statement.

 

I take it this is the first time someone has gotten banned from this forum?

 

Really? Read the post not being a dick i just found this funny.