Be weary of "scientific" journals

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Eastoff, Oct 4, 2013.

  1. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
  2. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    22,820
    Likes Received:
    29,558
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you mean wary?
     
  3. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    The other half of the story, from the same link:


    Bohannan says the exercise is a damning indictment of the way peer review works (or doesn't) at many online journals. Peer review is the time-honored system of having outside experts comb through submissions to identify flaws in method, data or conclusions. It's the way scientific journals do quality control.

    "Peer review is in a worse state than anyone guessed," he says.
     
  4. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    =[ thank you
     
  5. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    I would assume the "peers" either were not actually informed on the subject or did not read the papers
     
  6. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I assume he sent out 300 and that a few were like vanity publishing sites (pay to be published) and most were peer reviewed that just failed to do the job.
     

Share This Page