So as I become older, I tend to become more republican in thought . . . must mean republicans are right.
Dumbest post of the year. Congrats, Denny. I see why people like PapaG don't care if they get banned. Cuz they don't care to post on a board and line the pockets of someone who posts such idiotic things such as your recent rash of posts. I'd argue that you're showing plenty of ignorance on your part (well, I don't really have to argue - you have done the work for me in your posts). He'll come back when he realizes there is nowhere else to talk Blazers (and when he's allowed). Which is really the only reason any of us are here.
Nazis are all about biology and genetics. Your argument is solely based upon biology and genetics. Sorry you don't get the similarity, but it's plain as day.
Yawn. So now we're going from Neo-Nazi's to just plain ol' Nazi's? You're right, Denny. They're spot-on. I mean, I was using biology to simply explain that a penis is a male sexual reproductive organ, while a vagina is a female sexual reproductive organ. There was no form of judgment made, but I simply used a biological descriptor to identify a characteristic. An observation of a characteristic. I missed the part where I then took that descriptor, made judgment, used it to determine superiority, and then mass murdered 11 million people. Hot damn. I apologize for being an missing that similarity and sweeping it under the rug. How could I be so oblivious?
It's pretty easy to argue for your point when your arguments keep shifting. You've done a good job creating some greasy posts.
See what shit I have to deal with? He shotguns multiple views and pov; that it's hard to keep up with the actual point.
Hey, at least you're not being compared to a murdered of millions. And I thought I was one of the more open, tolerant, respectful people in this entire thread questioning his singular POV?
You made a judgment that the woman isn't a woman. Nazis made judgment that Jews, because of their genes, aren't human. I did not call you a Nazi. You say it's ok to have a differing opinion, etc, and not be wrong I am asking where YOU draw the line. The neo nazis have a differing opinion. I am not shifting anything here, just asking if their differing opinion is wrong? The next question is if theirs is wrong, why can't yours be?
Are you serious? They believed they were human. They thought the nazis were the best human. This is why people get so frustrated with you. You spin, spin, spin and use little plays on words to give you outs. You are trying to imply that giant is acting like a nazi because he brought up a penis vs vagina? Give me a fucking break. The nazis used entire groups with penis and vaginas and said yet were inferior. Giant never said transgendered peeps are lower beings because they want to be a girl; even though they have a penis?
I made no judgment, but please do tell. I used science. I don't even recall directly talking about some woman, other than biologically. I used basic, widely-accepted science that says, biologically, if you are born with a penis, you are a boy/man; if you are born with a vagina, you are a girl/woman. I USED SCIENCE. Just as you did to defend the stance of gender or psychological sex. These are two different concepts. You can be a boy and be a female under these two concepts. To use the homecoming queen, since this was a hot topic earlier, though many of the comments were gross, the HC queen is a boy, biologically. The HC queen is a female, psychologically. The words, biologically, don't really matter. If you want to call a penis an opus, and a boy a "Saskatoon", then the HC queen is a "Saskatoon" biologically and a female psychologically. The words are just words, mere descriptors. Do yourself (and all of us) a favor and google the "definition of biological sex". Don't just look for a single answer. Review several of them. The difference between my view and yours, Denny, is that I'm not telling you that you're wrong. And I'm not saying I'm right. My view is far more open than yours. It accounts for natural life, biology, and it accounts for psychology. It's looking at a much broader picture (or multiple pictures) than you're point of view.
And you didn't call me a Nazi. But comparing me to them in my way of thinking is pretty close. You know the saying, "When you point a finger at someone, you've got........."
I imply no such thing. I mentioned eugenics, too. That wasn't about mass murder, but making biological judgments about who should procreate. I mentioned the Russians banning homosexuality. Also a biological judgment. I mentioned ultra conservative Islamic societies forcing biologically selected people (women) to wear burkas. But yeah, you win.
I've explained it twice. Three times now. Where do YOU draw the line? Are the nazis' biologically based opinions right, wrong, tolerable, or you tell me?
Like I said.... greasy arguments. His retorts remind me a chameleon. Same framework, so they never really evolve, but they merely change colors with each moment and convenience to avoid their opponent.
