It's not up to me. I'm accepting the person at their word. I have zero reason to think they're lying, perverted, asking for it, inhuman, or otherwise not what they say they are.
Maybe the psychology is the freak accident, and the male genitals are correct. I can't say for sure. I'm not making judgment. Your statement did, however.
And that's wonderful. That doesn't necessarily mean that what they tell you they are is what they are biologically.
I am not. I asked about a person with penis and breasts. I see woman because she lives as one in every way she can.
Yes, you did. You apparently did not research biological sex. Generally speaking, the biological sex is based upon the sexual reproductive organ. And it's wonderful you see people as they want to be seen at all times. As I said a few days ago, you're probably more of a humanitarian-based than I am.
Well, I know you're not a Nazi. Biologically, you were born inferior to me because you're not white, blue eyes, and blonde hair. I am. So bow down.
I know what you meant by biological sex. As I said, to the homecoming queen, her genitalia is a curse. A biological mistake. Like a cat with 6 toes or a calf with two heads. That these mistakes can happen is sufficient to realize the flaw in the biological sex basis. I don't see any way to fairly judge other than asking the person, or taking their ongoing appearance and behavior into account. The bigotry is in treating a group of people differently because of your bias. You wouldn't go posting that your wife is a man, why not give the homecoming queen the same and equal treatment.
I don't have a visible adams apple, and you Asian folk have dainty hands, I don't think it's that easy. Especially after someone has been doing hormone therapy for a decade or longer. Just look at the picture of Buck in the first post, if you met him, would you know, would you guess, would you even suspect he has ever been anything but a dude?
Looking up the woman's skirt was figurative. Another way of saying "prove your view of the person through physical traits."
I hear gay peopel say all the time, they wish they could change their desires. You're saying their biology is wrong. I'm asking, how do you know their biology is wrong? Isn't it possible that their psychology is instead wrong? Or for some, it's biology and others its' psychology? I hear gay people talking more about their psychology being incorrect than their biology (though I do somes hear them refer to their biology being off). As I said, and have said all along, I can see people for their biology, and I try to see people for their psychology. I am not perfect, we all have our flaws. I see things more through biology lenses. You're telling me there's something wrong with it. I disagree with your assertion, because science says there are different viewpoints, and I agree with science. But I ultimately respect people, regardless. If that makes me a bigot, then I am a bigot. As I've said a few times now, you're a greater humanitarian than me. For the record, I don't believe I ever said anything much about the HC queen. I was mostly out of that discussion. She is both a boy and a female - there's really nothing wrong with that viewpoint.
Someone told me the other day that they met jesus and they were sure of it. I accepted them at their word as I have zero reason to think they are lying, perverted, asking for it, inhumane or otherwise have any motive to lie. Proof positive there is a jesus!
Now, I'm really starting to question all you bitches on this board. Which of you have penises? Which of you don't? Which of you identify with the female gender? :MARIS61:
If the person is good or not at presenting him/herself as the gender they prefer also shouldn't matter. So you call one person who has stubble a he and another one that doesnt a she, no, you can't base it on anything other than the intentions of the presenter. If they dress as a woman and choose a female name, then just go that route. Otherwise you will be crocodile dundee grabbing crotches everywhere you go.
