10SNE1?

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by BLAZER PROPHET, Oct 10, 2013.

  1. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    http://www.oregonlive.com/the-spin-of-the-ball/index.ssf/2013/10/where_should_we_look_for_the_n.html

    The reason I no longer follow tennis much is that it's become boring as hell. In those days of yesteryear there was real strategy. The racquets were wood and rather then a game where the one and only strategy is to thump the ball harder than your opponent with a racquet made of space age material, you had to move players around, play the net a lot more… Back then there were true 'specialists'- thumpers, net players, volley players… it was a game of contrasting games and their strategies. Today, it's thump, thump, thump… whoever happens to hit the hardest wins. [YAWN!] So I find the personalities issue valid, but secondary to the game becoming fully one dimensional.
     
  2. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I disagree with you entirely. There are plenty of players that hit the ball harder that Djokovic and Nadal, but cannot do so as skillfully. The excitement and beauty of a great match is based on the athleticism and shot precision displayed by the masters of the sport.
     
  3. porkchopexpress

    porkchopexpress Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah, I don't follow tennis too carefully, but I wouldn't call Nadal a 'thumper'. The guy wins cause he moves all over the court. Some of his matches against Federer and Djokavic have been pretty epic.
     
  4. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    Maybe so to a small degree, but the game as far as tactics go is barely 25% of what it used to be. It's booooooooooooooooooring.
     
  5. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,338
    Likes Received:
    25,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    You are wrong. Tennis has always been boring.

    barfo
     
  6. ehizzy3

    ehizzy3 RIP mgb

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    10,169
    Likes Received:
    6,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hillsboro/Bogotá
    tennis is so much fun to play.
     
  7. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,982
    Likes Received:
    57,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    barfo wins.
     
  8. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    The game is more athletic now. Net play and volleying are what I've always associated with tired/old players past their prime. It takes an incredible amount of court coverage and movement to be able to win now. The top three players in the game today are quite athletic (Nadal/Joke/Murray). Even a slowpoke like Federer is a better mover on Clay than someone like Sampras ever was, who was the game's undisputed best.


    Nadal is a beast and my favorite tennis player ever. He'll pwn you on any surface, and he's an Australian away from a Double Career Grand Slam. His dominance over RF is impressive. Joker is the only player to match-up somewhat decently against him in majors.
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2013

Share This Page