Abortion is acceptable, but..

I don't get it either. For all these scientific minded purist, the DNA of a child/Fetus would definitely identify it as human. What the hell sort of scientific argument are they using? It must come from some cult unknown to me.

 

There have been books written about this issue so hard to boil down into a couple of paragraphs. But here is a short legal take on it:

The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."

 

So as the baby is moving in the womb, it's okay to abort the baby because that baby cannot live outside the womb in this condition?

 

So is it a woman's right to abort the baby at 8 months?

 

So the woman says, "I don't want this baby in my stomach right now!", she can have the baby removed?

 

Rights come from the creator, so I would say you are misinformed. No one has been given the Right to Kill a human being by the creator. Caesar (the state) has assumed the right after due process and rightfully so.

However, it does not bother me that some women kill their child when they do not want to care for it, the village is better off without the burden, as disgusting as that maybe.

 

Not exactly but generally that is the legal standard.

How do you feel about the morning after pill?

 

I don't feel anything for any of it. I got snipped because I didn't want to give that burden to any woman. Sometimes I regret doing it, but I'm sure I would have regretted it more having a child with someone I can't stand.

 

Who is this creator you speak of?

 

meh people who preform partial birth abortions dont even try to make that argument...

 

You'll meet him one day

 

My dad.

 

Is that you papag?

 

Check it out. It was written by a very wise man.

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/bdsdcc:@field(DOCID @lit(bdsdcc02101))

 

What is the difference between killing life and interfering with the creation of life? Both are unnatural ways to avoid the creator's intent of birth.

 

You are right and I regretted doing it. But that was then when I decided. Now I'm paying for it after I found the woman I want to spend the rest of my life with.

But if life officially is created, then killing that life is no different than killing some 3 year old.