Re: Liberalism " set back a full generation" Hrauthammer Well-said. The contradictions are staggering . . . and so is liberalism right now. This healthcare fiasco is a classic example of the incompetence and inefficiency of big government, and more proof of why it should stay out of our lives.
What was that lie Romney told about the factory? I forgot... http://www.bing.com/search?q=romney factory&go=&qs=bs&form=QBLH Oh yeah. Sorting that link through all his other lies about factories, this was the factory whose closing he blamed on Obama in his many speeches. It had already closed under Bush. Man, Romney has a lot of bad factory articles.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323372504578468582435347210 What was it Romney said about GM and China? Go bing it. The Japanese ship cars built in Japan here to sell. Too bad GM can't build cars here and sell them overseas.
LOL. Just.... LOL. "Eisenhower's Interstate Highway system had some cost overruns and technical snafus on the first 5 miles of pavement. WHAT A DISMAL FAILURE IT IS!!!!"
Re: Liberalism " set back a full generation" Hrauthammer Ah, the poll that only comes out when it shows low approval ratings. Been a long time since we seen ya in these parts, poll! barfo
Re: Liberalism " set back a full generation" Hrauthammer History of steady decline. Not only when they show low approval ratings. They've been low for the past few years.
Re: Liberalism " set back a full generation" Hrauthammer No, that poll is published every day. You post it here only on days you like the result. barfo
Re: Liberalism " set back a full generation" Hrauthammer I like the result every day. Maybe the sinking of Obama's popularity coincides with the disaster known as liberal policies?
Well it seems to be working as planned. The ACA is so bad and is going to cause so many people to lose their healthcare coverage that there probably is no way to reverse course. When the employer mandate kicks in and they start dropping more people because the insurance they offer people do not meet the Obama super standards, the shit will hit the fan. I mean no way is Notre Dame going to offer birth control coverage in their healthcare package. Self insured employers will not be pushed to cover more afflictions when they already will welcome an escape route, to cease being responsible for the healthcare, of large populations of employees, dependents and retirees. Obama and the Democrats will have succeeded in destroying the healthcare coverage system in place for the majority of the population in the United States at the time of his election. There will be way more people uninsured as a result, than were uninsured before his election. No way back, corporate America will not return once they have been guided through portal to free their employees. What will we see emerge as the savior of the people? What plan will he bring? Will it be Barrack Obama with the saving Plan? A better question yet, will the Republicans help institute this wonderful new plan in order to help their constituents and thereby save their own asses?
They're going to release the figures next week for how many people signed up for ObamaCare. How long does it take to count to 12?
Thirteen has it's own bag and Obama is 13 for me and he is now in sole possession of 13th place but don't think that will hold him above 43rd when the final tally is taken. Never knew a man that could bumble along, claiming earnestly not to know about any shit and look so pleased to be standing right in it.
Polls didn't stop Bush's wars, and they won't stop ACA. It's the law of the land. Love it or leave it. If you don't like it, move to Singapore. We red-blooded Americans will bathe in our abundance of freedom while you yellow-bellied sapsuckers run from our colors.
ah I don't think I will be leaving. But I do look forward to the last call to duty to take care of some dumb asses.
Ah! I feel better already. God sent Nancy Pelosi to give us healthcare. Hail Mary! http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-co...mission-from-god-to-save-america-2738816.html
Are you at risk for AIDs? Well it doesn't matter now, you will pay for the risk in any case the next time you buy insurance Do you need Trans-gender reassignment surgery or expect to need it in the future? Not to worry about answering difficult questions. You will be cover for a price whether you need it or not, err unless you just don't cover any risk. No need to listen to those pesky religious life style lessons, Obama has you covered. Nancy helped too, she was on a mission for God to get you all this help. But Dang something is amiss here. Jesus said , "Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." Sound advice it is too, but then what is Caesar doing on the wrong side of the court doing good work and costing us money for risks where life style can take care of the risk? Perhaps we need to make sure Caesar takes his guidance from the right book like the Constitution. There is no business of Caesar in Article 1 section 8 about insurance risk and god talk is directly prohibited. It made me cringe when GW Bush talked about doing God's work, I don't like it when Nancy does it, and Barrack sure doesn't need to cover me for risks that Jesus has taught me to avoid. Perhaps Barrack and Nancy need to read again the role they have in the Constitution and leave the good work, God talk and bible lessons to you and me. Things really work quite well that way.
Maybe when the assertions liberals make turn out to be false, time after time, people will wake up. I think that's already in progress, though. http://ca.news.yahoo.com/u-jobs-market-seen-taking-hit-government-shutdown-060557886--business.html The department said there had been no "discernible" impact on the payroll figures from the 16-day shutdown, adding that it had received an above-average response rate in its survey of employers. "This was a resoundingly strong report, particularly in the context of the government shutdown which was supposed to wreak havoc on this number," said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York.
